Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Utility Values of Health Status in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Cristian Gonzalez1, Manuel Espinoza2, Matías Libuy1
1Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, RM, Chile.
This review synthesizes utility values for gastric cancer (GC) stages. Utility values decrease with advanced GC stages, highlighting the importance of patient preferences in healthcare decisions.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Oncology
- Quality of Life Research
Background:
- Gastric cancer (GC) presents a significant global health burden, with available treatments often incurring high costs and impacting patient quality of life.
- Utility values, reflecting patient preferences for health states, are crucial for health and economic decision-making.
- Systematized information on utility values across different GC stages is currently limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze existing literature on utility values associated with various stages of gastric cancer.
- To provide an updated overview of GC utility values and analyze the relevance of disease stage.
- To inform healthcare policy and clinical decision-making by incorporating patient preferences.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library.
- Studies reporting utility values derived from direct and indirect methods were selected for analysis.
- Extracted data underwent appraisal, followed by random-effects meta-analyses stratified by GC health states.
Main Results:
- Twelve studies encompassing 4585 patients were included in the meta-analysis.
- Mean utility values decreased progressively with GC stage: Stage I (0.77), Stage II (0.75), Stage III (0.70), and Stage IV (0.64).
- Significant heterogeneity was observed across all utility value estimates.
Conclusions:
- This systematic review offers a consolidated understanding of utility values in gastric cancer, emphasizing stage-specific differences.
- Patient preferences, as indicated by utility values, are vital considerations for policy development and clinical practice in GC management.
- The findings underscore the need to integrate patient-reported outcomes into healthcare economic evaluations.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...

