Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

09:31
In Vivo, Percutaneous, Needle Based, Optical Coherence Tomography of Renal Masses
Published on: March 30, 2015
Multicenter study of active surveillance for small renal masses: Real world practice pattern
Tarek Ajami1, Eric Villalba Lázaro1, Enrique Trilla Herrera2
1Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Urologic Oncology
|February 1, 2025
Summary
Active surveillance (AS) for small renal masses (SRM) is safe and effective. This study shows AS offers good oncological outcomes, with clinical factors guiding intervention decisions.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Oncology
- Nephrology
Background:
- Active surveillance (AS) is a recognized safe strategy for managing small renal masses (SRM) potentially indicative of renal cell carcinoma.
- Real-world outcomes of AS for SRMs were analyzed across five tertiary Spanish centers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess clinical, radiological, and pathological characteristics of SRMs under AS.
- To evaluate therapeutic options and oncological outcomes for SRMs managed with AS.
- To identify predictors of deferred intervention (DI) in patients with SRMs on AS.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter retrospective review included 384 patients on AS from January 2012 to September 2024.
- Analysis focused on AS indications, initial lesion size, growth rate (GR), and progression.
- Cox regression analysis identified factors influencing DI, with a mean follow-up of 43 months.
Main Results:
- The average GR was 1.4 mm/y; 15% of patients underwent active treatment.
- Age, tumor size, and tumor growth correlated with DI; initial size correlated with GR.
- High-grade clear cell carcinoma was more frequent in fast-growing lesions (>5 mm/y GR) compared to slow-growing ones.
Conclusions:
- Active surveillance is a viable strategy for SRMs, maintaining favorable oncological outcomes.
- Clinical factors including age, tumor size, GR, and initial biopsy results guide intervention decisions.
- No disease progression or cancer-specific deaths were observed in this cohort, supporting AS safety.

