Current evidence and indications for left atrial appendage closure

Masaya Shinohara1, Mike Saji2, Hideki Koike2

  • 1Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Journal of Cardiology
|February 2, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Left atrial appendage closure offers a safe alternative to oral anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at risk of stroke. This review examines device therapies for AF stroke prevention in OAC-intolerant individuals.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Devices
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent arrhythmia, increasing stroke risk.
  • Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is standard but contraindicated/intolerable for many AF patients.
  • The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a primary source of thrombus in AF.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review indications for percutaneous LAA closure (LAAC).
  • To evaluate evidence for current LAAC device therapies.
  • To examine challenges in patient selection and post-procedural care for LAAC.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of LAAC literature.
  • Analysis of safety and efficacy data for LAAC devices.
  • Examination of clinical guidelines and expert consensus.

Main Results:

  • LAAC is an effective stroke risk reduction strategy for OAC-intolerant AF patients.
  • Newer generation LAAC devices show improved safety and efficacy.
  • Patient selection and antithrombotic strategies require further optimization.

Conclusions:

  • Percutaneous LAAC is a viable alternative to OAC for stroke prevention in select AF patients.
  • Ongoing research is refining LAAC indications and management protocols.
  • Optimizing patient selection and post-procedural care will enhance LAAC outcomes.