Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
Comparative evaluation of multimarker algorithms for early-stage HCC detection in multicenter prospective studies
Jinlin Hou1, Thomas Berg2, Arndt Vogel3,4,5
1Hepatology Unit and Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou China.
Insights
The GAAD algorithm, which excludes AFP-L3, shows similar performance to the GALAD algorithm in detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). This suggests AFP-L3 may not be essential for HCC surveillance using these algorithms.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Oncology
- Biomarker Discovery
Background:
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection relies on algorithms combining demographic data and serum biomarkers.
- The GAAD algorithm includes gender, age, AFP, and DCP, while GALAD adds AFP-L3.
- The clinical utility of AFP-L3 in HCC surveillance requires re-evaluation due to changing disease patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical performance of GAAD and GALAD algorithms for early-stage HCC detection.
- To determine the clinical utility of AFP-L3 in differentiating HCC from chronic liver disease (CLD).
Main Methods:
- Algorithm development (STOP-HCC-ARP) and validation (STOP-HCC-MCE) studies were conducted.
- International, multicenter, case-control design included participants with HCC or CLD.
- Serum biomarkers were measured using Elecsys and μTASWAKO assays.
Main Results:
- In the development cohort (n=1006), AUCs for early-stage HCC vs. CLD were similar for GAAD (Cobas) and GALAD (Cobas/μTASWAKO) at ~91%.
- In the validation cohort (n=1142), AUCs for early-stage HCC vs. CLD were ~91.4% for GAAD (Cobas) and GALAD (Cobas/μTASWAKO).
- All-stage HCC detection showed AUCs of 94.7-95.0%; performance was consistent across etiologies, cirrhosis presence, and regions.
Conclusions:
- The GAAD (Cobas) algorithm demonstrated comparable clinical performance to GALAD (Cobas/μTASWAKO) in differentiating HCC from CLD.
- AFP-L3 appears to have a negligible role in the GALAD algorithm for HCC surveillance.
- GAAD (Cobas) may serve as an effective tool for HCC detection in patients with CLD undergoing surveillance.
Background & Aims:
We compared the clinical performance of the novel GAAD (gender [biological sex], age, alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], des-gamma carboxyprothrombin [DCP]) and GALAD (gender [biological sex], age, AFP, Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive AFP [AFP-L3], DCP) algorithms to deduce the clinical utility of AFP-L3 for detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from chronic liver disease (CLD).
Methods:
An algorithm development study (STOP-HCC-ARP) and clinical validation study (STOP-HCC-MCE) were conducted, recruiting adult participants with HCC (confirmed by radiology or pathology) or CLD in an international, multicenter, case-control design. Serum biomarkers were measured using Elecsys assays (GAAD and GALAD [Cobas]) or μTASWAKO assays (GALAD [μTASWAKO]) while blinded to case/control status.
Results:
In STOP-HCC-ARP (algorithm development cohort), 1,006 patients {297 HCC (41.4% early-stage [Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer {BCLC} 0/A) and 709 CLD} were included. Area under the curve (AUCs) for discriminating between early-stage HCC vs. CLD were 91.4%, 91.4%, and 90.8% for GAAD (Cobas), GALAD (Cobas), and GALAD (μTASWAKO), respectively. The clinical validation cohort of STOP-HCC-MCE comprised 1,142 patients, (366 HCC cases [48% early-stage], 468 specificity samples and 302 CLD); AUCs for GAAD (Cobas), GALAD (Cobas), and GALAD (μTASWAKO) for discriminating between early-stage HCC vs. CLD were 91.4%, 91.5%, and 91.0%, respectively; AUCs were 94.7-95.0% for all-stage HCC. The GAAD and GALAD algorithms demonstrated similar good performance regardless of disease etiology, presence of cirrhosis, geographical region, and within pan-tumor specificity panels (p <0.001).
Conclusions:
GAAD (Cobas) demonstrated good clinical performance, similar to GALAD (Cobas and μTASWAKO) algorithms, in differentiating HCC and CLD controls, across all disease stages, etiologies, and regions; therefore, AFP-L3 may have a negligible role in GALAD for HCC surveillance.
Impact And Implications:
To improve the detection of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from benign chronic liver disease (CLD), algorithms combining demographic characteristics and serum biomarkers, such as GAAD and GALAD, have been developed. GAAD combines gender (biological sex), age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), des-gamma carboxy-prothrombin (DCP); GALAD combines the same characteristics and biomarkers as GAAD with the addition of Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive AFP (AFP-L3). Changing disease etiologies and treatment paradigms have raised questions regarding the utility of AFP-L3 in HCC surveillance. Our work demonstrates that the GAAD (Cobas) algorithm demonstrated good clinical performance and was as sensitive and specific as the GALAD (Cobas) and GALAD (μTASWAKO) algorithms in differentiating HCC and CLD controls, across all disease stages, etiologies, and geographical regions; therefore, AFP-L3 may have a negligible role in HCC detection. Our study provides supporting evidence that in participants with CLD undergoing guideline-directed HCC surveillance, the GAAD (Cobas) algorithm may be used as an effective method for the detection of HCC, potentially resulting in improved patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
07:35Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018