Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

Environmentally-controlled Microtensile Testing of Mechanically-adaptive Polymer Nanocomposites for ex vivo Characterization
Published on: August 20, 2013
Dynamic versus static testing and in vivo mechanical performance of poly(glycolide-trimethylene
Norman L Ilich1, Siamak Saifzadeh2, Dietmar W Hutmacher3
1Australian Research Council Training Centre for Cell and Tissue Engineering Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, 1 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; Centre for Materials Science, School of Chemistry & Physics, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia.
Abstract:
The manufacturing of millimeter-sized implants for delayed drug release presents several challenges. However, it allows for the encapsulation of a therapeutic agent within a single device, enabling precise control over factors such as geometry, polymer composition, and drug formulation. The relatively large size, however, means that when inserted into subcutaneous tissue the implants experience mechanical stresses that are not predicted by current in vitro methods consisting of incubation under static conditions. The absence of a suitable in vitro assay complicates the device development process, often resulting in unsuccessful preclinical testing. This study presents the fabrication of flexible implants of poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate-co-ε-caprolactone), in vitro degradation, and performance when implanted subcutaneously in rats. Predicting the in vivo behaviour is addressed by the development of a scalable, high-throughput, cyclic flexural testing system. Flexural loading of the implant demonstrates a clear impact on loss in mechanical properties compared to static conditions in lipoprotein lipase. Under static conditions, a lag time of 60 days is observed before sustained release of the model dye. Conversely, the flexural loading assay results in early fracture by 20 days consistent with what is observed in the animal model. Decisively, this study emphasizes the importance of tailoring in vitro assays according to the dosage form and intended mode of administration. Implementation of a dynamic in vitro assay is invaluable to efficiently evaluate device viability and release kinetics and will, in turn, allow a more streamlined workflow for translation into preclinical models.
Related Concept Videos
Classification and Mechanical Properties of Synthetic Polymers
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

