Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

8.0K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.0K
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

3.0K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
3.0K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

91
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
91
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

93
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
93
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.4K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.4K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

82
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
82

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recovery of Monoethanolammonium Acetate from Ionosolv Liquors Using a γ-Valerolactone-Based Aqueous Two-Phase System.

ChemSusChem·2026
Same author

HER2 heterogeneous breast cancer models reveal novel therapeutic targets and subclonal dynamics during evolution to resistance to HER2-targeted therapies.

Cancer discovery·2026
Same author

Shedding light on the dynamic interplay of positive and negative symptoms of psychosis with Behavioral Tractography.

NPJ digital medicine·2025
Same author

The general version of Hamilton's rule.

eLife·2025
Same author

Age polyethism can emerge from social learning: A game-theoretic investigation.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Single-Incision Broström-Gould Surgery with Peroneal Debridement and Calcaneal Osteotomy.

JBJS essential surgical techniques·2025
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Exploring the structural lexicon of the Proteome via Metric Geometry.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Linking retinal sampling in neural encoding models to temporal profiles of visual processing in humans.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

CAdir: Joint clustering of cells and genes for single-cell transcriptomics with visualization-driven cluster quality assessment.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Systematic design of auxotrophic strains and media conditions to probe metabolic functions in E. coli.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Neuronal excitability and parameter variability in the Hodgkin-Huxley model.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

626

Repeated games with partner choice.

Christopher Graser1, Takako Fujiwara-Greve2, Julián García3

  • 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Boston, Massecheusetts, United States of America.

Plos Computational Biology
|February 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Allowing individuals to leave unsatisfactory partnerships significantly boosts cooperation in repeated games. This partner choice mechanism, unlike random or kin-based interactions, fosters more dependable, cooperative relationships.

More Related Videos

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.4K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

626
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.4K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary game theory
  • Behavioral economics
  • Social dynamics

Background:

  • Repetition is a key factor in the evolution of cooperation, particularly in repeated prisoner's dilemmas.
  • Standard models often assume an exogenous probability of interaction repetition, limiting partner choice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of allowing individuals to terminate interactions and choose new partners on the evolution of cooperation.
  • To compare cooperation levels in a model with partner choice against standard models and kin selection.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations of repeated prisoner's dilemmas incorporating an option for individuals to leave and find new partners.
  • Analysis of cooperation levels and partner selection dynamics within the simulation.

Main Results:

  • Introducing the option to leave substantially increases the average level of cooperation observed in simulations.
  • Partner choice leads to endogenous phenotypic assortment, where cooperative individuals associate with other cooperative individuals.
  • This model provides a better explanation for human cooperation in repeated settings than traditional models.

Conclusions:

  • The ability to choose and leave partners is a powerful driver for the evolution of cooperation.
  • Partner choice, by enabling selection of dependable partners, enhances cooperation more effectively than random matching or kin selection.
  • This mechanism better reflects real-world human cooperation, which often involves selective partner engagement.