Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025
An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
Published on: November 30, 2022
Incidence and characteristics of device-related pressure injuries in intensive care: A four-year analysis
Paul Fulbrook1, Jacob Butterworth1
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, Queensland 4014, Australia; Nursing Research and Practice Development Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland 4032, Australia.
Objectives:
To describe and analyse the incidence and characteristics of intensive care-acquired device-related pressure injuries.
Design:
Secondary data analysis of intensive care-acquired pressure injuries during 2019-2022.
Setting:
Single general intensive care unit in Brisbane, Australia.
Main Outcome Measures:
Intensive care-acquired pressure injury incidence, device-related pressure injury incidence, non-device-related pressure injury incidence, pressure injury category and location, device associated with pressure injury.
Results:
During the 4-year period, there were 7343 intensive care admissions of whom 413 (5.6 %) patients developed an intensive care-acquired pressure injury. The incidence of device-related pressure injury was 4.0 % compared to 2.7 % non-device-related pressure injury. In total there were 461 device-related pressure injuries, which were mostly (55 %) associated with endotracheal tubes or the methods used to secure them. Consequently, the majority of injuries were found on the mucous membranes (lips, mouth and tongue). The other main devices associated with injuries were high-flow nasal prongs (9.3 %), indwelling urinary catheters (6.7 %), nasogastric tubes (6.5 %) and oxygen masks (5.0 %). Overall, device-related pressure injuries were less severe than non-device-related pressure injuries, however they occurred in a shorter time frame (median 4 days versus 6 days). A range of factors was associated with device-related pressure injuries but overall, their presence or duration was less than with non-device-related pressure injuries.
Conclusion:
The study results provide rigorous evidence of the incidence and characteristics of device-related pressures injuries, that can be used to benchmark with other intensive care units nationally and internationally.
Implications For Clinical Practice:
Endotracheal tube-associated pressure injuries were the most common type of device-related injury, providing a clear focus for preventative intervention. Given the high proportion of these device-related injuries, effective interventions would have a significant impact on overall reduction of intensive care-acquired pressure injuries. Since most injuries occur within three days of device insertion, early preventative intervention is time-critical.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
01:22Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
01:26Healthcare Associated Infections I: Iatrogenic, Exogenic and Endogenic
HAIs significantly increase the cost of health care. Extended stays in healthcare institutions, increased disability, increased costs of medications, including specialized antibiotics, and prolonged recovery times add to the patient's expenses and the healthcare institution and funding bodies.