Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

A Rapid and Efficient Method for Assessing Pathogenicity of Ustilago maydis on Maize and Teosinte Lines
Published on: January 3, 2014
Development of maize under different pH values, humidity and presence of Azospirillum brasilense
P E Schaefer1, L A Tabaldi2, T M Müller1
1Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.
Abstract:
Abiotic factors play a crucial role in the productivity of agricultural systems, and stress resulting from these factors can significantly restrict crop yields. To address this challenge, the use of tools capable of mitigating adverse effects, such as growth-promoting bacteria, is essential. This study aimed to investigate the growth of maize plants inoculated or not with Azospirillum brasilense, subjected to variations in soil pH and moisture. Two experiments were conducted under controlled conditions, in which maize plants inoculated with A. brasilense were subjected to variations in (i) soil moisture (100, 75, 50, and 25% of field capacity) and (ii) hydrogenic potential (pH 4.5; 5.5; 5.0; 6.0; and 6.5). It was observed that low moisture favored root growth but limited the development of leaves and stems of maize plants at the V4 phenological stage. The increased root development provided by A. brasilense under conditions of water restriction resulted in a reduction in water use efficiency by the leaves. Additionally, more acidic and/or alkaline pH levels also reduced the dry mass of roots and aboveground parts, as well as the carboxylation efficiency of rubisco, but increased water use efficiency (At 25% FC water deficit, WUE increased by 9.5% in rhizobacterium-treated seeds and by 16% in the control). Inoculation with A. brasilense promoted greater development of maize plants, as evidenced by increased volume, root length, and leaf area. Although maize plants showed better initial development without water restriction and in soil with a pH of 5.9, A. brasilense allowed maize plant growth even at pH 5.1, without significant adverse impacts.
More Related Videos
09:21Inhibition of Aspergillus flavus Growth and Aflatoxin Production in Transgenic Maize Expressing the α-amylase Inhibitor from Lablab purpureus L.
Published on: February 15, 2019
08:28Mycorrhizal Maps as a Tool to Explore Colonization Patterns and Fungal Strategies in the Roots of Festuca rubra and Zea mays
Published on: August 26, 2022
Related Concept Videos
The Roles of Bacteria and Fungi in Plant Nutrition
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Responses to Salt Stress
Factors Influencing Microbial Growth: pH
Factors Influencing Microbial Growth: Osmolarity
Microbe-Plant Interactions