Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Barriers to Effective Communication II

Barriers to Effective Communication II

The barriers to effective communication also include cultural barriers, semantic barriers, gender barriers, and time constraints.
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...

Barriers to Effective Communication I

Barriers to Effective Communication I

A communication barrier is any distortion or interruption during a conversation, resulting in miscommunication of the message. A good communicator should know these barriers and continuously check for the listener's understanding by obtaining feedback.
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Healthcare professionals' understanding and current practice in sarcopenia screening and diagnosis in the UK: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Health inequalities tackled through intersectoral collaboration: longitudinal process issues and insights.

Health promotion international·2026

Same author

Working with democratically elected councillors: Reflections on research engagement in local government.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Exploring research capacity and capability in a local authority: qualitative insights from leaders and staff.

BMC public health·2025

Same author

Health-Embodiment of corporeal experiences: Meanings of health among individuals living with comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension in The Gambia.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025

Same author

Sex workers and their stories: using timelines as a creative method in research involving underserved populations.

Nurse researcher·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Obstacles to co-producing evaluation knowledge: power, control and voluntary sector dynamics.

Louise Warwick-Booth¹, Ruth Cross¹, James Woodall¹

¹Leeds Beckett University, UK.

Evidence & Policy : a Journal of Research, Debate and Practice

|February 5, 2025

Summary

Co-production in evaluation presents challenges to knowledge exchange, particularly concerning power dynamics and vested interests. Addressing these issues is crucial for improving evidence sharing and research practices.

Keywords:

co-production emotions evaluation politics power voluntary sector

More Related Videos

Determining and Controlling External Power Output During Regular Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion

Determining and Controlling External Power Output During Regular Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion

Published on: February 5, 2020

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Determining and Controlling External Power Output During Regular Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion

Determining and Controlling External Power Output During Regular Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion

Published on: February 5, 2020

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

Social Sciences
Evaluation Studies
Knowledge Management

Background:

Co-production is recognized for its potential in evidence creation.
However, its impact on knowledge exchange, especially in evaluation, is under-researched.
Existing literature lacks depth on how co-production principles can complicate knowledge exchange.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically examine three evaluation projects involving voluntary sector stakeholders.
To illustrate the challenges encountered in knowledge exchange due to the co-production of evidence.
To analyze the interplay between co-production and knowledge exchange in evaluation contexts.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of challenges across three co-production evaluation projects.
Reflection on power dynamics, co-productive work practices, and emotional factors influencing knowledge exchange.
Qualitative examination of how these elements impact the sharing of evidence.

Main Results:

Project 1: Withheld internal monitoring data hindered reporting and knowledge sharing.
Project 2: Commissioners' focus on success limited learning dissemination, keeping valuable insights internal.
Project 3: Statutory stakeholders discredited evidence of a failed local authority model, impacting knowledge exchange.

Conclusions:

Co-production in evaluation can be problematized by power dynamics, vested interests, and emotional factors.
Bias in reporting and academic publication can stem from current knowledge exchange processes.
Further exploration of power-sharing research practices is needed to enhance knowledge exchange.