Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
Collaborative and Stepped Care for Mental Disorders: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Outpatient
Daniela Heddaeus1, Tharanya Seeralan, Kerstin Maehder
1Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany"; Department of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Center for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, University of Hamburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.
Background:
Collaborative and stepped care (CSC) models are recommended in guidelines because of their effectiveness in treating depression and anxiety disorders. The evidence for other mental disorders is, however, limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model (COMET) for patients with depressive, anxiety, somatoform, and/or alcohol-related disorders and related comorbidities in the routine care setting in Germany.
Methods:
A prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled, parallelgroup superiority trial was conducted; the subjects were patients in primary care practices. The primary endpoint was the change in mental health-related quality of life, assessed with the SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS) at 6 months in the intention-to-treat population. The secondary endpoints were symptom severity, remission, and response.
Results:
Forty-one primary care offices were randomized either to COMET (n = 20) or treatment as usual (TAU, n = 21), and 615 patients were recruited (CSC: n = 307; TAU: n = 308). Data were available for 62% (COMET) and 55% (TAU) of the participants at 6 months. No significant group difference was found with respect to the primary endpoint (-1.96 ,95% confidence interval [-4.39; 0.48], p = 0.113) or any of the secondary endpoints.
Conclusion:
We found no superiority of the COMET model for the mental disorders addressed. Methodological issues, including differences at baseline and high dropout rates, make these findings challenging to interpret. Future studies should ensure comparability of groups, allocate resources for quality management, and investigate more suitable outcome measures, paying attention to factors of implementation.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
08:25Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Patient-centered Care