Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

11:02
Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
Published on: October 18, 2013
19.4K
Detecting gene copy number alterations by Oncomine Comprehensive genomic profiling in a comparative study on FFPE
Fabio Bozzi1, Elena Conca1, Marco Silvestri2,3
1Department of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Scientific Reports
|February 5, 2025
Summary
Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays like OCA+ show promise for detecting copy number alterations (CNAs) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. However, validation is crucial as sensitivity for CNA detection in FFPE samples needs improvement.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Copy number alterations (CNAs) are critical in cancer development and precision medicine.
- Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are standard for diagnostics, but CNA detection can be challenging.
- Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) offers genome-wide CNA discovery, yet requires validation in FFPE samples.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay plus (OCA+) for detecting CNAs in FFPE samples.
- To compare OCA+ CNA detection with a whole-genome assay and orthogonal fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) tests.
- To assess the sensitivity and specificity of NGS-based CNA detection in routine diagnostic FFPE material.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 14 FFPE samples using the OCA+ targeted NGS assay.
- Comparison of OCA+ results against a whole-genome assay.
- Validation of detected CNAs using orthogonal FISH assays.
Main Results:
- The OCA+ targeted NGS assay demonstrated lower sensitivity but equal specificity for detecting copy number gains and losses compared to whole-genome analysis.
- OCA+ accurately identified copy number gains ≥5.2 based on its proprietary software pipeline.
- No optimal threshold was identified to differentiate true and false positive losses.
- FISH validation confirmed seven CNAs with copy number gain ≥6 or complete loss.
Conclusions:
- Targeted NGS assays like OCA+ require further validation for reliable CNA detection in FFPE tissues.
- While promising, the sensitivity limitations of current NGS panels necessitate careful interpretation of results for clinical application.
- Robust validation studies are essential to fully leverage the potential of NGS for CNA-based precision oncology in FFPE samples.

