Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.1K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.1K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

7.8K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
7.8K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.6K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.6K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

171
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
171

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How should covariates be handled in randomized trials? Empirical evidence from 50 trials and recommendations for practice.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Doubly Robust Estimators of the Restricted Mean Time in Favor Estimands in Individual- and Cluster-Randomized Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Comparing clinical outcomes of rFSH versus rFSH+HP-hMG in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in real‑world practice: a retrospective study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Fair and Robust Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Optimal Policies in Multilevel Studies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same author

Hydrophilic Polymer-Modified Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Hydroxyapatite Three-dimensional-Printed Scaffolds with Enhanced Hydrophilicity and Biodegradability for Regenerative Endodontic Applications.

Journal of endodontics·2026
Same author

On flexible covariate adjustment under covariate-constrained randomization.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Instrumental Variable Estimation of Marginal Structural Mean Models for Time-Varying Treatment.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Semiparametric Joint Modeling for Survival Analysis with Longitudinal Covariates.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Dimension Reduction for Large-Scale Federated Data: Statistical Rate and Asymptotic Inference.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Facilitating Heterogeneous Effect Estimation via Statistically Efficient Categorical Modifiers.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Density Estimation of a Long-Term Trend from Repeated Semicontinuous Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Functional Integrative Bayesian Analysis of High-dimensional Multiplatform Clinicogenomic Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Model-robust and efficient covariate adjustment for cluster-randomized experiments.

Bingkai Wang1, Chan Park1, Dylan S Small1

  • 1The Statistics and Data Science Department of the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Journal of the American Statistical Association
|February 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces robust statistical methods for cluster-randomized experiments, improving covariate adjustment accuracy. The new methods reduce bias and enhance the reliability of intervention effect estimates in real-world settings.

Keywords:
Causal inferenceCluster-randomized trialCovariate adjustmentEfficient influence functionEstimandsMachine learning

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Cluster-randomized experiments are common for evaluating interventions in real-world settings.
  • Model-based covariate adjustment is frequently used but risks bias if models are misspecified.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop robust statistical methods for covariate adjustment in cluster-randomized experiments.
  • To address limitations of existing model-based methods, including potential bias from misspecification and cluster size variation.

Main Methods:

  • Adapted generalized estimating equations and linear mixed models with weighted g-computation.
  • Proposed efficient, triply-robust estimators allowing flexible covariate adjustment and accounting for post-randomization cluster size variation.
  • Validated methods using machine learning and parametric models for nuisance function estimation.

Main Results:

  • The proposed estimators are consistent, asymptotically normal, and efficient when using machine learning.
  • When using parametric models, the estimators are triply-robust, offering protection against different model misspecifications.
  • Demonstrated superiority over existing methods through simulations and real-world data analyses.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methods provide more reliable and less biased estimates of treatment effects in cluster-randomized trials.
  • These advancements are crucial for accurate intervention evaluation in complex, real-world healthcare and public health settings.