Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
Published on: August 4, 2023
How to perform a high-quality peer review
1Sorbonne Université; Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, INSERM UMRs 938; Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Abstract:
High-quality peer review is a cornerstone of credible and impactful scientific and medical publishing. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of the best practices, responsibilities, and evaluation criteria for peer reviewers in clinical and translational research. By adhering to high standards of objectivity, rigor and professionalism, peer reviewers support the integrity of scientific research and contribute to the evolution of evidence-based medicine. We elaborate on the principles and structured processes that ensure a thorough, impartial review, aiming to guide reviewers in producing evaluations that enrich the scientific discourse and foster innovation in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Blind Procedures

