Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

170
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
170
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.4K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.4K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.3K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.3K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.2K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.2K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

5.6K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
5.6K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

3.4K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Construction and validation of an osteosarcoma prognostic model reveals that SERPINE2 contributes to the progression and cisplatin sensitivity in osteosarcoma.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

Acetyl tributyl citrate as a new risk factor for osteoporosis: An integrated study from multi-level toxicological assessment and experimental validation.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2026
Same author

AVIL promotes osteosarcoma progression and cisplatin resistance via ARP2/3-mediated DNA damage repair.

Translational oncology·2026
Same author

Development of efficient targeted insertion mediated by CRISPR-Cas12a and homology-directed repair in maize.

Frontiers in genome editing·2025
Same author

Insights into seasonal nitrogen dynamics and microbial responses in dual-mode stormwater-lake water biofiltration.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

The measurement properties of patient experience scales in the intensive care unit: A systematic review.

Nursing in critical care·2025
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.0K

Optimal Control of Directional False Discovery Rates in Large-Scale Testing.

Guozhu Tang1, Yicheng Kang2, Dongdong Xiang1

  • 1KLATASDS-MOE, School of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Statistics in Medicine
|February 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel three-group model for analyzing gene expression data, improving the identification of over-expressed and under-expressed genes while controlling false discoveries.

Keywords:
monotone likelihood ratiomultiple testssignal classificationthree‐group models

More Related Videos

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.5K
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.0K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.5K
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical data analysis
  • Genomics
  • Statistical genetics

Background:

  • High-throughput technologies measure thousands of gene expression levels simultaneously.
  • Identifying over-expressed and under-expressed genes is crucial for analyzing gene expression data.
  • Existing two-group models fail to control specific false discovery rates for over- and under-expressed genes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a general three-group model for gene expression data analysis.
  • To develop a decision rule that controls both over- and under-expressed false discovery rates.
  • To optimize the expected number of true discoveries while maintaining desired false discovery proportions.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a general three-group model accommodating dependence between test statistics.
  • Design of a decision rule with a monotonic structure for controlling false discovery rates.
  • Linearization of two-directional false discovery rate constraints using the monotonic structure.

Main Results:

  • The proposed decision rule optimizes true discoveries while controlling false discovery rates for both over- and under-expression.
  • Data-driven versions of the procedures are suggested and their consistency is established.
  • The new procedures demonstrate strong performance in comparisons with existing methods and in genomic applications.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed three-group model and decision rule offer improved control over false discoveries in gene expression analysis.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of identifying differentially expressed genes.
  • The findings have significant implications for genomic studies and biomedical research.