Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Evaluating the Effects of Dynamic Navigation on the Accuracy and Outcomes of the Autogenous Bone Ring Technique for
Yu-Chen Chang1, Ning Zhu1, Jiayu Liu1
1Department of Oral Implantology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, PR China.
Objectives:
Autogenous bone ring technique (BRT) is a one-stage vertical augmentation approach with simultaneous implant placement. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of autogenous BRT assisted by dynamic navigation (DN) with freehand approach (FA) for vertical ridge augmentation.
Materials And Methods:
Twenty-four patients eligible for autogenous BRT were randomly assigned to DN or FA groups. Digital preoperative design was conducted for both groups. BRT surgeries were executed with or without the aid of DN in the two groups. Accuracy outcomes evaluated angular and linear deviations at the bone ring in the donor site (BR-D), recipient site (BR-R), and implant entry/apex between planned and actual positions revealed by cone-beam computed tomography. Vertical augmentation-related outcomes, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed over 6 months.
Results:
Twenty-four patients underwent surgery while one was lost to follow-up. The DN group showed significantly lower mean (SD) BR-R angular (3.58 [2.07] vs. 8.77 [4.20]°) and entry deviation (1.43 [0.51] vs. 2.01 [0.70] mm). For BR-D, the DN group had significantly lower angular (4.80 [2.62] vs. 12.97 [6.26]°), entry (1.45 [0.96] vs. 3.52 [1.54] mm), and apex deviation (1.28 [0.64] vs. 3.50 [1.47] mm) compared to the FA group. Implant angular deviation (3.74 [2.14] vs. 9.17 [4.39]°) and apex deviation (1.75 [0.44] vs. 2.35 [0.82] mm) was significantly lower in the DN group. In the FA group, one patient exhibited temporary lower lip hypoesthesia. No significant differences were observed in vertical bone gain, resorption, or patient-reported outcomes.
Conclusions:
Compared to FA, DN may improve the accuracy of autogenous BRT procedures for vertical ridge augmentation while minimizing invasiveness.
Trail Registration:
This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn; Registration No. ChiCTR2200065585; registration date: 2022/11/09).
