Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

07:11
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
7.2K
Long-Term Bone Height Changes After Sinus Floor Elevation With Maxillary or Mandibular Bone Grafts: A Radiological
Wilhelmus F Bouwman1, Francis A Eijsackers2, Nathalie Bravenboer3
1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam UMC and Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
|February 6, 2025
Summary
Both maxillary and mandibular bone grafts effectively increase bone height after sinus floor elevation, with similar long-term patterns and minimal bone loss, ensuring implant stability.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Dental Implantology
- Bone Grafting Techniques
Background:
- Maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) is a common procedure to augment bone height in the posterior maxilla.
- Autogenous bone grafts from the maxilla or mandible are frequently used for MSFE.
- Assessing the long-term impact of graft source on maxillary bone height is crucial for predictable outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of maxillary versus mandibular autogenous bone grafts on maxillary bone height following MSFE.
- To evaluate the long-term bone height changes and implant survival rates in patients undergoing MSFE with different graft sources.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 92 patients who underwent MSFE with either maxillary (n=37) or mandibular (n=55) bone grafts.
- Panoramic radiographs were used to measure bone height up to 60 months postoperatively.
- Comparison of bone height changes at different positions (gap, free-end, distal to implant).
Main Results:
- Both graft types initially increased maxillary bone height post-MSFE.
- A gradual bone height loss was observed over time in both groups, with no significant difference for gap and free-end positions.
- Mandibular grafts demonstrated less bone loss at distal to implant positions.
- All implants remained covered by bone without exposure or loss, indicating successful MSFE.
Conclusions:
- Maxillary and mandibular autogenous bone grafts yield similar long-term bone height patterns after MSFE.
- Both graft sources provide predictable bone augmentation for dental implant placement.
- The choice between maxillary and mandibular grafts may be influenced by specific site requirements, particularly for distal implant positions.
Keywords:
atrophic maxillaautogenous bone graftlong‐term studymandibular bone graftsmaxillary bone graftsmaxillary sinus floor elevationradiographsradiological measurementssinus augmentationsinus floor elevation
