Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Multiplex PCR Assay for Typing of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Mec Types I to V in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Published on: September 5, 2013
Identification of a mepR mutation associated with tigecycline resistance in a clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolate
Hongjie Xing1, Likuan Zhang1, Chenglong Li1
1College of Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, P. R. China.
Objectives:
To identify the role and function of mepR variants in conferring resistance to tigecycline in clinical Staphylococcus aureus.
Methods:
The identification of the mepR and mepA variants in S. aureus DMB26a was performed by whole-genome sequencing and Blast alignment. The effects of the mepRD and mepAD variants of DMB26a on tigecycline susceptibility were evaluated through deletion and complementation analyses, as well as the determination of gene expression levels by RT-qPCR. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for DMB26a and its mutants were determined by antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Results:
A mepR variant, designated mepRD, and a mepA variant, designated mepAD, were identified in the clinical tigecycline-resistant S. aureus isolate DMB26a, which showed 78.72% and 84.92% amino acid identity to the MepR and MepA proteins of S. aureus NCTC 8325-4, respectively. Our findings revealed that deletion of mepA in the tigecycline-susceptible S. aureus RN4220 did not lead to a decrease in the MIC of tigecycline, and that there was also no change in the tigecycline MIC after the complementation with mepAD. Furthermore, we constructed a mepR + mepA deletion strain of S. aureus RN4220 and complemented it with mepRD + mepAD. In that case, a 4-fold increase in the tigecycline MIC was observed in S. aureus RN4220ΔmepR + mepA-pLI50_mepRD + mepAD compared with S. aureus RN4220ΔmepR + mepA. In addition, the relative expression of mepAD was increased 6-fold under the regulation of mepRD.
Conclusions:
This study provides the identification of a mepR variant contributing indirectly to tigecycline resistance via mediating increased expression of mepA in a clinical S. aureus isolate.
Insights
A novel mepR variant (mepRD) indirectly confers tigecycline resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by increasing mepA gene expression. This finding is crucial for understanding antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in clinical isolates.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Tigecycline is a critical antibiotic for treating multidrug-resistant bacterial infections.
- Understanding resistance mechanisms is essential for effective antimicrobial therapy.
- Staphylococcus aureus is a significant human pathogen with increasing resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and characterize mepR variants in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
- To elucidate the functional role of mepR variants in tigecycline resistance.
- To investigate the interaction between mepR and mepA in conferring resistance.
Main Methods:
- Whole-genome sequencing and Blast alignment to identify mepR and mepA variants.
- Deletion and complementation analyses to assess the impact of variants on tigecycline susceptibility.
- RT-qPCR to determine gene expression levels.
- Antimicrobial susceptibility testing to determine Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs).
Main Results:
- A novel mepR variant (mepRD) and a mepA variant (mepAD) were identified in a tigecycline-resistant S. aureus isolate.
- Deletion of mepA alone did not affect tigecycline MIC.
- Co-expression of mepRD and mepAD resulted in a 4-fold increase in tigecycline MIC.
- mepRD significantly upregulated the expression of mepAD (6-fold increase).
Conclusions:
- A mepR variant (mepRD) contributes indirectly to tigecycline resistance.
- This resistance is mediated by the mepR variant's ability to increase mepA expression.
- The findings highlight a novel mechanism of tigecycline resistance in clinical S. aureus.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Bacterial Transformation
Griffith made an unexpected discovery when he killed the pathogenic strain and mixed its remains with the live, non-pathogenic strain. Not only did the mixture kill host mice, but it also contained living pathogenic bacteria that...

