Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity and incident heart failure after myocardial infarction: a cohort study
Yuzhong Wu1,2, Jingjing Zhao1,2, Chen Chen1,2
1Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Insights
Pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity predict heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in myocardial infarction patients. These markers aid early risk stratification and intervention for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a recognized outcome post-myocardial infarction (MI), though less common than heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
- Early identification of HFpEF predictors in MI patients is crucial for developing targeted preventive strategies.
- This study investigates pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity as potential early indicators of HFpEF following MI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity can serve as early predictors of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI).
- To assess the association between these hemodynamic parameters and the risk of developing HFpEF after MI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 5188 participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, including 802 with a history of MI and no prior heart failure.
- Heart failure events were categorized into HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) and heart failure with mildly reduced or reduced ejection fraction (LVEF <50%).
- Competing risk regression models were employed to analyze the relationship between baseline pulse pressure, aortic valve peak velocity, and HFpEF development.
Main Results:
- Over a 6-year follow-up, higher pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity were significantly associated with an increased risk of HFpEF in MI patients.
- Specifically, a 1-SD increase in pulse pressure correlated with a 1.60-fold higher risk of HFpEF, while aortic valve peak velocity showed a 1.37-fold higher risk.
- Patients with elevated pulse pressure (≥68 mmHg) or aortic valve peak velocity (≥1.4 m/s) exhibited substantially higher risks of HFpEF. The presence of two or more risk factors (elevated pulse pressure, elevated aortic valve peak velocity, diabetes, atrial fibrillation) increased HFpEF risk over 16-fold.
Conclusions:
- Pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity are significant early predictors of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients following myocardial infarction.
- These findings support their utility in early risk stratification for HFpEF in the MI population.
- The results advocate for incorporating these markers into clinical practice to guide timely interventions and prevent HFpEF progression.
Background:
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a recognised outcome in patients with myocardial infarction, although heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is more common. Identifying early indicators specific to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with myocardial infarction could support targeted preventive strategies. This study aimed to determine if pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity could serve as early predictors of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with myocardial infarction.
Methods:
We retrospectively analysed data from 5188 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study who were free from heart failure at baseline, including 802 individuals with a history of myocardial infarction. Heart failure events were classified as either heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) or heart failure with mildly reduced or reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%). Competing risk regression models were used to examine associations of baseline pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity with heart failure subtypes.
Results:
Over 6 years of follow-up, 217 cases of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (including 50 in patients with myocardial infarction) and 127 cases of heart failure with mildly reduced or reduced ejection fraction (33 in patients with myocardial infarction) were identified. Among patients with myocardial infarction, a 1-SD increase in pulse pressure was associated with a 1.60-fold higher risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (95% CI 1.30 to 1.97), and a similar association was observed for aortic valve peak velocity (HR: 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.58). Patients with pulse pressure ≥68 mm Hg had a 3.83-fold higher risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with those with lower pulse pressure, and those with aortic valve peak velocity ≥1.4 m/s had a 2.10-fold higher risk compared with those with lower values. Patients with myocardial infarction with two or more risk factors among elevated pulse pressure, aortic valve peak velocity, diabetes and atrial fibrillation had over 16 times the risk of developing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with those without these risk factors (p<0.001).
Conclusions:
Pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity are significant predictors of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with myocardial infarction, suggesting their potential value in early risk stratification. These findings support the use of these markers to guide timely interventions aimed at preventing the progression to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
More Related Videos
06:51Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Blood Pressure
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical...