Robust contrastive learning based on evidential uncertainty for open-set semi-supervised industrial fault diagnosis
Shuaijie Chen1, Chuang Peng1, Lei Chen1
1Engineering Research Center of Digitized Textile & Apparel Technology, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China; College of Information Science and Technology, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China.
Abstract:
Semi-supervised learning is increasingly applied in industrial fault diagnosis, presuming that the label spaces of labeled samples and unlabeled samples are identical. However, unknown faults in real-world scenarios present a challenge for traditional closed-set approaches. To this end, we propose a novel framework for open-set semi-supervised industrial fault diagnosis, named Evidential Robust Contrastive Learning (ERCL). The theory of evidence is introduced to explicitly assess sample uncertainty, guiding the evidential robust contrastive representation module to implement instance-level training strategies for each unlabeled sample. Additionally, an adaptive out-of-distribution detection module is developed to detect unknown faults by evaluating the difference in mutual information distributions between in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, thereby avoiding over-reliance on prior knowledge. The proposed framework is validated with the Tennessee Eastman process and polyester esterification process. As proved in the experiments, ERCL exhibits superior diagnosis accuracy in open scenarios with limited labeled data.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Stereotype Content Model
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Cause and Effect
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...


