Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

09:34
A Method to Estimate Cadaveric Femur Cortical Strains During Fracture Testing Using Digital Image Correlation
Published on: September 14, 2017
7.4K
Identifying proximal humerus fractures: an algorithmic approach using registers and radiological visit data
Tomi Nissinen1,2, Reijo Sund3,4, Sanna Suoranta5,6
1Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland. tomi.nissinen@uef.fi.
Summary
Combining administrative registers and radiological data significantly improves automated identification of proximal humerus fractures. This approach enhances fracture coverage in large datasets for better health tracking.
Area of Science:
- Medical informatics
- Orthopedic research
- Public health surveillance
Background:
- Accurate identification of proximal humerus fractures is crucial for managing osteoporosis and fragility fractures.
- Traditional administrative register analysis has limitations in capturing all fracture cases.
- Automated methods are needed for efficient large-scale fracture tracking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of identifying proximal humerus fractures using administrative datasets without manual review.
- To compare the accuracy of traditional register analysis with a combined register and radiological data approach.
- To develop and validate algorithms for automated fracture identification.
Main Methods:
- Utilized national healthcare registers and a regional radiological image archive (PACS).
- Developed algorithms for automated proximal humerus fracture identification.
- Established a gold standard using patient records and self-reports from the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study (OSTPRE) for validation.
- Analyzed data from 11,863 post-menopausal women (2004-2022).
Main Results:
- Traditional register analysis achieved 75% coverage of proximal humerus fractures over 19 years.
- Combining register and radiography visit data improved fracture identification coverage from 74% to 81%.
- The combined approach reduced the false discovery rate from 8% to 7% compared to register analysis alone.
Conclusions:
- The proposed method offers a more reliable automated approach for identifying proximal humerus fractures from administrative data.
- This advancement supports the automated tracking of fragility fractures in extensive datasets.
- Improved accuracy in fracture identification can enhance patient care and epidemiological studies.

