Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

04:59
Author Spotlight: Developing a Disposable Dosator for Preclinical Testing of Dry Powder Inhalers in Small Animal Models
Published on: August 18, 2023
785
A Pilot Study: Evaluating Disposable Syringes Compared to Non-Disposable Syringes for Dental Training
Robert Glickman1, Tara Byrd2, Marci H Levine1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, NYU College of Dentistry, New York, New York, USA.
Journal of Dental Education
|February 7, 2025
Summary
Dental students preferred non-disposable syringes despite disposable ones being safer. Familiarity and stability favored non-disposable syringes, while disposable ones had aspiration issues. Early curriculum introduction could improve disposable syringe usability.
Area of Science:
- Dental Anesthesia Delivery
- Medical Device Safety
- Clinical Education
Background:
- Needlestick injuries are common with non-disposable syringes due to manual needle handling.
- Disposable syringes feature protective sheaths to minimize needle exposure during use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare disposable and non-disposable syringes for local anesthesia administration in dental students.
- To evaluate student and faculty experiences with both syringe types during clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- A pilot study involved two groups of third-year dental students (D3) alternating between disposable (N=67) and non-disposable (N=66) syringes over two 4-week sessions.
- Local anesthesia was administered to live patients under faculty supervision.
- Surveys were completed by students and faculty post-session to capture their experiences.
Main Results:
- Two needlestick injuries occurred with non-disposable syringes; none with disposable syringes, though no statistically significant difference in exposures was found.
- Students found non-disposable syringes easier to use and were more likely to prefer them due to stability and familiarity.
- Disposable syringes were easier to assemble/disassemble but perceived as less stable during aspiration.
Conclusions:
- Dental students and faculty preferred non-disposable syringes, citing familiarity and stability, despite potential safety benefits of disposable types.
- Dissatisfaction with disposable syringes stemmed mainly from the aspiration system and lack of experience.
- Integrating both syringe types early in dental curricula and providing faculty training could enhance usability and safety.

