Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
Published on: July 14, 2016
Different properties of successful and error saccades in marmosets
Wajd Amly1, Chih-Yang Chen1, Hirotaka Onoe2
1Division of Neurobiology and Physiology, Department of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract:
Various oculomotor tasks have been used to study eye movements, cognitive control, attention, and neurological disorders. Typically, analysis focuses on successful trials, where the saccade lands very close to the intended target, in both humans or non-human primates (NHPs). Error trials, in which the saccade fails to land on the intended target, are often excluded from these analyses. In this study, we hypothesized that saccades contain information that can predict whether they will result in success or not. We collected data from common marmosets performing the gap saccade task and the oculomotor delayed response task. Successful saccades in both tasks were characterized by higher peak velocities, shorter durations, and shorter latencies compared to errant saccades, regardless of whether the amplitudes were matched or not. These results were further validated using a generalized linear model, with saccade velocity, duration, and latency as predictors. The model demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing between behavioural outcomes. Our findings suggest that the likelihood of a saccadic eye movement leading to a successful outcome may be predetermined, potentially reflecting the interaction between cognitive processes and saccade programming.
More Related Videos
06:12Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
Published on: March 13, 2018
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Accuracy and Precision
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory