Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Eligibility requirements in hypnotic trials.

T Roehrs, G Vogel, F Vogel

    Sleep
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    An Adaptation of Perceived Causal Networks for Children and Adolescents (PECAN-CA): An Evaluation of its Reliability and Feasibility.

    Child psychiatry and human development·2025
    Same author

    Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb[over ¯] Final State Using pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same journal

    A reality check for mHealth sleep apps: bridging the empirical void in digital sleep health.

    Sleep·2026
    Same journal

    Sleep, circadian, and mental health in neurodivergent neurotypes: Lived experience perspective on the research landscape and roadmaps.

    Sleep·2026
    Same journal

    Nighttime light exposure is associated with metabolic dysfunction in schizophrenia: A cross-sectional analysis of the LENS study.

    Sleep·2026
    Same journal

    Sleep Need Outcompetes Preparation: Reframing Sleep Initiation Through Naturalistic Behaviour.

    Sleep·2026
    Same journal

    The Quest for Automated Pediatric Sleep Scoring: Are We There Yet?

    Sleep·2026
    Same journal

    Sex Differences in the Sleep Architecture and Sleep-Disordered Breathing in C57BL/6 J Mice.

    Sleep·2026
    See all related articles

    When evaluating insomnia treatments, consider regression toward the mean. This statistical phenomenon can affect study results, as seen in sleep latency measurements for patients with insomnia.

    Area of Science:

    • Sleep Medicine
    • Clinical Research Methodology
    • Psychiatry

    Background:

    • Insomnia is a prevalent sleep disorder affecting patient well-being and quality of life.
    • Evaluating the efficacy of hypnotic medications requires rigorous study design to minimize bias.
    • Previous studies may not have adequately accounted for statistical variations in patient screening.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess hypnotic efficacy in patients with insomnia using a standardized protocol.
    • To investigate the impact of repeated screening on patient eligibility for clinical trials.
    • To identify potential biases in hypnotic efficacy study designs, specifically regression toward the mean.

    Main Methods:

    • Forty-eight patients with insomnia underwent initial screening at two sleep laboratories.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Eligibility criteria included a mean sleep latency of 30 minutes or greater.
  • Thirty-four patients were re-screened 2-6 months later; 16 failed the second screen.

    • Main Results:

    • Sleep latency was significantly shorter during the second screening compared to the first.
    • No systematic differences were found between laboratories, procedural changes, or patient attrition.
    • The change in sleep latency highlights the influence of regression toward the mean.

    Conclusions:

    • Regression toward the mean is a critical statistical consideration in designing hypnotic efficacy studies.
    • Study designs must account for this phenomenon to accurately interpret patient data and treatment effects.
    • Further research is needed to develop methodologies that mitigate the impact of regression toward the mean in sleep research.