Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Characterization of studies considered and required under Medicare's coverage with evidence development program
Maryam Mooghali1,2, Osman Moneer3, Guneet Janda4
1Department of Internal Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.
Medicare’s Coverage with Evidence Development program generates higher-quality clinical studies. These studies, compared to initial National Coverage Determination studies, feature more randomization, larger patient populations, and a focus on clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Trial Design
- Health Policy Analysis
Background:
- The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services established Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) in 2005 to assess items and services with limited evidence.
- CED mandates participation in approved clinical studies to determine if services meet
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the quality of evidence from CED-approved studies with studies used for initial National Coverage Determinations (NCDs).
Main Methods:
- Identified CED-covered items/services and their associated studies.
- Searched PubMed and Google Scholar for primary endpoint results of CED-approved studies.
- Reviewed NCD decision memos to identify original research studies used for initial coverage decisions.
- Characterized and compared CED-approved studies and NCD studies.
Main Results:
- CED has supported 26 items/services with 196 NCD studies and 116 CED-approved studies (2005-2023).
- CED-approved clinical trials were more likely to be randomized (93.2% vs. 52.5%), focus on clinical outcomes (87.9% vs. 65.8%), and enroll Medicare beneficiaries (25.9% vs. 3.1%) than NCD studies.
- CED-approved studies had larger patient populations (median 302 vs. 100).
- Half of CED-approved studies had not yet publicly reported primary endpoint results.
Conclusions:
- The CED program successfully promotes the generation of more robust clinical studies compared to those informing initial coverage decisions.
- While CED enhances study design, opportunities remain to improve the dissemination of study results.
- Further strengthening study design and timely result reporting under CED is recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...

