Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

A CO2 Concentration Gradient Facility for Testing CO2 Enrichment and Soil Effects on Grassland Ecosystem Function
Published on: November 21, 2015
Comparison of carbon storage between urban wilderness and artificial greenspaces
Shang-Chun Hu1,2, Jing Que1, Jia-Hui Liu1
1College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Abstract:
Vegetation carbon sink research mostly focused on natural vegetation with large areas. A few studies analyzed carbon sinks of urban artificial greenspace, but few studies summarized the carbon sink function of urban wilderness, which is a research direction to explore the synergistic improvement of carbon sinks and biodiversity in urban ecosystems. With data from literature, we compared the carbon storage per unit area of urban wilderness and urban artificial greenspaces, from the aspects of vegetation and soil. We found that urban wilderness had a significant advantage over artificial greenspaces in terms of vegetation carbon storage per unit area. Among different types of urban wilderness, the carbon storage per unit area of woodlands/wetlands was significantly higher than that of abandoned or vacant brownfield areas and artificial greenspaces in industrial and commercial residential areas, but not significant against artificial greenspaces in park leisure area, from both vegetation and soil aspects. To increase urban carbon storage, we proposed measures to rewild artificial greenspaces and protect urban wilderness, especially woodlands/wetlands. Future research could explore the differences between urban wilderness and artificial green-spaces in terms of vegetation characteristics and soil properties, and examine the carbon storage of different plot types of urban wilderness.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Carbon Cycle
Threats to Biodiversity
Habitat Fragmentation
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Bioremediation
Naturalistic Observations

