Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Comparing Phenotypes for Acute and Long-Term Response to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Machine Learning
Prasanth Ganesan1, Maxime Pedron1, Ruibin Feng1
1Division of Cardiology, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA (P.G., M.P., R.F., A.J.R., B.D., H.J.C., S.R.-C., V.S., K.A.B., T.B., P.C., P.J.W., S.M.N.).
Identifying patients for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation success is challenging. Machine learning reveals distinct phenotypes for acute versus long-term outcomes, highlighting the need for better predictors of sustained arrhythmia freedom.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Predicting patient response to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is difficult.
- AF ablation outcomes can be inconsistent, with some patients achieving long-term freedom despite initial procedural failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To use machine learning to identify distinct phenotypes for acute and long-term AF ablation success.
- To differentiate the physiological factors influencing immediate versus sustained outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 72 features from 561 AF patients, including electrograms, ECG, cardiac structure, lifestyle, and clinical data.
- Comparison of six machine learning models to predict acute and long-term ablation endpoints.
- Shapley explainability analysis to define patient phenotypes and external validation in 77 AF patients.
Main Results:
- The 1-year success rate was 69.5%, with a poor correlation between acute termination (49.6%) and long-term success.
- Machine learning models showed higher predictive power for acute termination (AUC=0.86) than long-term outcomes (AUC=0.67).
- Long-term success phenotypes were linked to clinical/lifestyle factors, while acute termination phenotypes reflected electrical features.
Conclusions:
- Acute and long-term responses to AF ablation are driven by distinct clinical and electrical physiology.
- The dissociation of phenotypes suggests potential roles for factors like attenuated AF progression in long-term success.
- Developing reliable procedural predictors for long-term AF ablation success remains a critical unmet need.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
09:17High-Resolution Endocardial and Epicardial Optical Mapping in a Sheep Model of Stretch-Induced Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 29, 2011