Exploring the therapeutic efficacy difference in claudin18.2-targeted cell therapy revealed by single-cell sequencing

Mingyang Ma1, Chang Liu2, Lei Jiang1

  • 1Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing 100142, China.

Iscience
|February 10, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) therapy shows promise for gastric cancer. Naïve-like T cells and CLDN18 expression predict treatment success, while MYC and tumor-T cell interactions indicate poor outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Cellular Therapy

Background:

  • Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) therapy is effective against blood cancers but faces challenges in solid tumors.
  • Previous studies of NCT03874897 showed positive outcomes for CT041 CAR T treatment in advanced CLDN18.2-positive gastric cancer.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate prognostic factors influencing CT041 CAR T therapy efficacy in gastric cancer patients.
  • To identify biomarkers for patient selection and potential strategies to enhance CAR T therapy outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Collected peripheral blood and ascites samples from five gastric cancer patients post-CT041 infusion (3 and 7 days).
  • Analyzed the proportion of naïve-like T cells, CLDN18 expression in ascites, MYC expression, and tumor-T cell interactions.

Main Results:

  • A higher proportion of naïve-like T cells correlated with better response to CT041 treatment.
  • High CLDN18 expression in ascites epithelial cells predicted a favorable prognosis.
  • High MYC expression in ascites epithelial cells and strong tumor-T cell interactions were associated with adverse outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Findings suggest that naïve-like T cell proportion and CLDN18 expression are favorable prognostic indicators for CAR T therapy in gastric cancer.
  • MYC expression and tumor-T cell interactions may represent negative prognostic factors.
  • These results offer a basis for refining patient selection and improving CAR T therapy efficacy in solid tumors.

Related Concept Videos