Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

53.5K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
53.5K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

228.6K
Overview
228.6K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

63.7K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
63.7K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

73.5K
Overview
73.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and validation of an artificial intelligence classifier for histologic grading of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.

Endoscopy international open·2026
Same author

Glycemic index, glycemic load, and colorectal cancer risk stratified by insulin receptor expression: the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective study.

European journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Beyond "Epidemiological Alchemy" in the Era of Open Data and Generative AI: Prepared Minds Still Matter.

Journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

S100A4-TLR4-TGF-β axis as a therapeutic target for Dupuytren's contracture in diabetic patients.

Cell death discovery·2026
Same author

Analysis of the relationship between body mass index and kidney function decline in a middle-aged Japanese population: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Pyrrole-Bearing Porous Network Polymers Synthesized via Halogen-Bond-Assisted Radical Solid-Phase Polymerization for Highly Efficient and Selective Adsorption of Lithium Ions from Model Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) Brine.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same journal

Introduction to case-crossover study design for drug-drug interaction.

Annals of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum to: A new electronic medical record database linked to claims data and discharge abstract data (the RWD database) in Japan: Study design and profile.

Annals of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Association between metformin use and cervical cancer risk in women with diabetes in Japan: a retrospective cohort study.

Annals of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Community pharmacist-led educational intervention to recommend ophthalmology visits for patients with diabetes: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Annals of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Effect of a financial incentive scheme on promoting prescription of biosimilars: a interrupted time-series analyses.

Annals of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum to: Changes of practice on out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of SOS-KANTO 2017 study.

Annals of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2025

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
09:37

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Published on: August 15, 2019

9.6K

Introduction to Mendelian randomization.

Shiu Lun Au Yeung1, Shan Luo1, Masao Iwagami2,3,4,5

  • 1School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Annals of Clinical Epidemiology
|February 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants to strengthen causal inference in observational studies, offering an advantage over traditional methods by reducing bias. This approach, resembling randomized controlled trials, enhances the reliability of findings in genetic epidemiology.

Keywords:
CausalityGeneticsMendelian randomization

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.1K
Optogenetic Random Mutagenesis Using Histone-miniSOG in C. elegans
04:51

Optogenetic Random Mutagenesis Using Histone-miniSOG in C. elegans

Published on: November 14, 2016

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2025

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
09:37

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Published on: August 15, 2019

9.6K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.1K
Optogenetic Random Mutagenesis Using Histone-miniSOG in C. elegans
04:51

Optogenetic Random Mutagenesis Using Histone-miniSOG in C. elegans

Published on: November 14, 2016

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Conventional observational studies often suffer from unobserved confounding.
  • Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a robust approach to causal inference by leveraging genetic variants as instrumental variables.
  • Genetic variants are randomly allocated at conception, mimicking randomization in clinical trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of Mendelian randomization (MR) methodology.
  • To discuss the fundamental principles, assumptions, and designs of MR studies.
  • To highlight practical considerations and emerging challenges in MR research.

Main Methods:

  • Description of the origin and core assumptions of MR (relevance, independence, exclusion restriction).
  • Explanation of one-sample and two-sample MR designs.
  • Summary of key aspects including instrument selection, data sources, and statistical analysis.

Main Results:

  • MR enhances causal inference by utilizing random genetic allocation, mitigating confounding.
  • Different MR designs, including drug target MR, offer versatile applications.
  • The STROBE-MR checklist and guidelines aid in conducting rigorous MR studies.

Conclusions:

  • Mendelian randomization is a powerful tool for improving causal inference in genetic epidemiology.
  • Understanding MR assumptions and designs is crucial for reliable results.
  • Addressing the credibility crisis in MR requires adherence to guidelines and critical evaluation of studies.