Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Choroidal coloboma masquerading as regressed retinoblastoma.

BMJ case reports·2026
Same author

In-office bleaching effect with different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide on enamel color and demineralization.

Bioinformation·2026
Same author

Effect Sizes and Statistical Power in Hearing Aid Research.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Perinatal Neuroprotective Strategies and Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Preterm Infants ≤32 Weeks' Gestational Age: A Prospective Study With a Historical Control Cohort.

Cureus·2026
Same author

CLnc-Pred: A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Long Non-Coding RNAs in Crops.

Current genomics·2026
Same author

AgriBioNER: A Named Entity Recognition Tool for Identification of ncRNA and Diseases in Agricultural Literature.

Current genomics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2025

Engineered Vascularized Muscle Flap
08:18

Engineered Vascularized Muscle Flap

Published on: January 11, 2016

8.2K

Flap vs. Flapless Implant Placement in Immediate Functional Loading: A Comparative Analysis.

Shailesh Jain1, Sahba Hassan2, Anu Sharma3

  • 1Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences
|February 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Flapless implant surgery leads to less crestal bone loss compared to traditional flap surgery. This minimally invasive approach may improve outcomes in dental implant procedures.

Keywords:
Dental implantsflapless surgeryimplant placement

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.4K
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

15.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2025

Engineered Vascularized Muscle Flap
08:18

Engineered Vascularized Muscle Flap

Published on: January 11, 2016

8.2K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.4K
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

15.4K

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Oral Surgery

Background:

  • Crestal bone loss is a critical factor affecting dental implant success.
  • Traditional flap surgery for implant placement can lead to significant bone resorption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare crestal bone loss between flapless and flap implant placement techniques.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of minimally invasive implant surgery.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 60 patients undergoing dental implant placement.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: flap surgery and flapless surgery.
  • Crestal bone loss was measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months post-surgery using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Main Results:

  • The flapless implant surgery group exhibited statistically significant less bone loss on the mesial side (P=0.03).
  • No significant difference in bone loss was observed on the distal side between the groups.
  • Overall, the flapless method demonstrated a trend towards reduced crestal bone loss.

Conclusions:

  • Flapless implant placement is associated with decreased crestal bone loss compared to flap surgery.
  • Minimally invasive flapless procedures may offer advantages in preserving marginal bone around dental implants.