Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: prevalence of disease-specific red flags
Niccolò Maurizi1,2, Emanuele Monda3, Elena Biagini4
1Service of Cardiology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (Unil), Rue du Bugnon 46, BH16, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Insights
Red flags are common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, with over 34% detectable in primary care. Non-cardiac red flags often indicate non-sarcomeric causes, while cardiac red flags suggest sarcomeric HCM.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- European Society of Cardiology guidelines advocate for systematic red flag (RF) searches in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) to personalize management.
- The prevalence and clinical significance of RFs in various HCM phenotypes and clinical settings remain largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence and clinical significance of red flags (RFs) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
- To determine the diagnostic yield of RFs in different clinical settings for HCM phenocopy detection.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 818 patients with diagnosed HCM from four European centers was analyzed.
- Red flags (RFs) were systematically categorized into five domains: family history, physical examination, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and laboratory tests.
Main Results:
- 39% of patients had sarcomere gene variants, 29% had TTR and GLA variants, 19% had syndromic causes, and 13% had no identifiable cause.
- A total of 2979 RFs were identified; 34% were detectable via clinical history and examination alone (generalist setting), while 66% required electrocardiography and echocardiography (cardiologist setting).
- Non-cardiac RFs were most frequent in Rasopathies, inherited metabolic, and mitochondrial disorders (48-57%), while cardiac RFs dominated sarcomeric HCM (70-88%).
Conclusions:
- Red flags are prevalent in HCM patients, with non-cardiac RFs common in non-sarcomeric HCM and cardiac RFs in sarcomeric HCM.
- Over 34% of RFs, particularly those relevant to rare HCM phenocopies, can be identified in a generalist setting.
- Increased awareness and utilization of basic diagnostic tools for HCM-related RFs can significantly improve diagnostic yield and resource allocation.
Background And Aims:
The European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend a systematic search for diagnostic clues or 'red flags' (RFs) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) to better tailor disease management. To date, the prevalence and clinical significance of RF associated with HCM phenotypes in different clinical settings are unknown.
Methods:
The study cohort comprised 818 patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCM [479 (62%) males, mean age 49 ± 21 years] referred to four European centres. Pre-specified RFs were categorized into one of five domains: (i) family history; (ii) physical examination; (iii) electrocardiography; (iv) echocardiography; and (v) laboratory.
Results:
A total of 318 (39%) patients had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic sarcomere gene variant; 240 (29%) a TTR and GLA variant; 154 (19%) a syndromic cause; and 106 (13%) no identifiable cause. In the overall cohort, 2979 RFs were identified. Of these, 1018 (34%) were identifiable from clinical history and examination alone (generalist setting) and 1961 (66%) by 12-lead electrocardiogram and echocardiography (cardiologist's office). Non-sarcomeric patients were diagnosed more often aged <20 and after 60 years (476/500, 95%). Syndromic diseases such as Rasopathies, inherited metabolic disorders, and mitochondrial disorders were diagnosed in neonatal/early childhood (mean age 3 ± 2 years), whereas patients with Danon disease, Friedreich's ataxia, Noonan syndrome, and PRKAG2 cardiomyopathy were identified mostly during adolescence (mean age 16 ± 8 years). Non-cardiac RFs identified by clinical history, physical examination, and routine laboratory testing were most frequent in patients with HCM caused by Rasopathies, inherited metabolic disorders, and mitochondrial disorders (48%, 47%, and 57%, respectively). Physical RFs were almost exclusively observed in patients with a definite non-sarcomeric aetiology [348/350 (99%)]. On the contrary, most RFs associated with geno-positive and geno-negative HCM were derived from electrocardiogram and echocardiography [692/990 (70%) and 332/375 (88%), respectively].
Conclusions:
Red flags are a common finding in patients presenting with HCM, most commonly non-cardiac in non-sarcomeric aetiology and cardiac in sarcomeric HCM. Over 34% of RF, most relevant to rare HCM phenocopies, can be potentially detected in a generalist setting. Investing in high-touch-low tech, widespread awareness for HCM-related RF may provide substantial advantage in terms of diagnostic yield and appropriate use of resources.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings I: Inspection and Palpation
Abnormal findings observed during an inspection
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck

