Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published on: April 13, 2021
State- and territory-based differences that impede the establishment of a harmonised national registry
Larissa K Lloyd1, Calum Nicholson1, Geoff Strange1
1Clinical Research Group, Heart Research Institute, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia; and Cardiology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Level 6, Building 75, Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Abstract:
Objective This paper aims to identify and describe legislative and administrative barriers to hospital participation and national data linkage for the National Australian Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) Registry. Methods A narrative review based on the National Australian CHD Registry experience of establishing participating hospital sites and national linkages associated with each jurisdiction. Results There were numerous identified barriers that could be overcome with additional resources/time, and barriers that could not be overcome, reported by jurisdiction. Conclusions There is a pressing need for greater harmonisation of state-based legislation governing research and harmonisation of administration to reduce duplication. Substantial state-based differences hinder the establishment of a truly national registry.
Related Concept Videos
Purpose of Health Records II
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Standards of Care II
Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:
Standards of Care I
Legal Guidelines for Documentation

