Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
Provocative tests of anal sphincter function correlate with symptoms and subtypes of faecal incontinence
Alexander O'Connor1,2, Donghua Liao3, Matthew Davenport4,2
1Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre Manchester, Manchester, UK alexander.oconnor@manchester.ac.uk.
Objectives:
High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) is the established investigation in faecal incontinence (FI). However, provocative tests (functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) and anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR)) have been proposed as alternatives. This study uniquely explores all three methods in correlation with FI symptoms and subtypes.
Methods:
This was a prospective observational study of patients with FI attending a tertiary pelvic floor unit between August 2022 and January 2024. Patients underwent HRAM, FLIP and AAR with the order randomised. FI severity was assessed with the Vaizey score and quality-of-life with the Manchester Health Questionnaire.
Results:
40 patients (39 women, median age: 62 (range: 38-85)) were recruited with 27 (67.5%) reporting urge FI, 8 (20%) mixed and 5 (12.5%) passive incontinence. FLIP squeeze measurements correlated with the Vaizey score, including incremental squeeze pressure at 40 mL (rs=-0.412; p=0.008) and 50 mL (rs=-0.414; p=0.009) and the pressure-diameter volume loop at 50 mL (rs=-0.402; p=0.011). Incremental squeeze opening pressure with AAR correlated with the Vaizey score (rs=-0.339; p=0.032). There was no correlation between symptom severity and HRAM parameters, or any parameter and quality-of-life scores. Resting parameters with all three modalities were lower in passive FI: mean resting pressure (HRAM; p=0.010), yield pressure (FLIP; p=0.031) and opening pressure (AAR; p=0.006). With FLIP, there was a trend towards reduced squeeze function in the urge group (pressure-diameter volume loop at 50 mL; p=0.295).
Conclusions:
FLIP and AAR correlate better with FI symptoms compared with HRAM. Therefore, these provocative tests could be used to guide the management of FI in prospective studies.
More Related Videos
07:41Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
08:19In Vitro Characterization of the Electrophysiological Properties of Colonic Afferent Fibers in Rats
Published on: September 27, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Psychosexual Stages of Personality: Anal
Irritable Bowel Syndrome I: Introduction
IBS is a chronic condition that can persist over a long period or recur frequently.
The pathogenesis of IBS involves a complex interplay of the following factors:
Altered...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...