Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025
Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
Sacituzumab govitecan in advanced urothelial carcinoma: TROPiCS-04, a phase III randomized trial
T Powles1, S Tagawa2, C Vulsteke3
1Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Background:
Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated efficacy and manageable toxicity in the phase II TROPHY-U-01 study in pretreated advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We report the results from final analysis of the global open-label randomized phase III TROPiCS-04 study (NCT04527991) in pretreated aUC.
Patients And Methods:
Patients with aUC whose disease had progressed on prior platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy were randomized 1 : 1 to receive SG or treatment of physician's choice (TPC; paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by investigator and blinded independent committee review, as well as safety.
Results:
Overall, 711 patients were randomized. After a median follow-up of 9.2 months, the primary endpoint was not met [median OS for SG versus TPC: 10.3 months versus 9.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.02, P = 0.087]. Median PFS with SG and TPC was 4.2 months and 3.6 months, respectively (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03); ORR (95% CI) was 23% (18% to 27%) and 14% (10% to 18%). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with SG was neutropenia (35%, including 12% with febrile neutropenia). Incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs (67% versus 35%) and grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 7% versus 2%) was higher with SG versus TPC. In the SG group, 16/25 grade 5 TEAEs were infections with neutropenia mostly occurring early in the treatment course of patients with multiple risk factors for febrile neutropenia. Primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) usage with SG and TPC was 21% and 22%, respectively.
Conclusions:
SG did not result in a significant improvement in OS or PFS compared with TPC in pretreated aUC, although SG activity was demonstrated by a higher ORR. Early toxicity-related complications with SG may have impacted efficacy outcomes.
