Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Audit and group feedback in nursing home physician groups: lessons learned from a qualitative study
Gary Y C Yeung1,2, Charlotte A W Albers3,4,5, Martin Smalbrugge3,4
1Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. g.y.yeung@amsterdamumc.nl.
Audit and group feedback (A&F) improves healthcare quality. This study analyzed physician feedback sessions in nursing homes, finding facilitators crucial for action planning and varied group engagement with audit data.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare quality improvement
- Medical education
- Health services research
Background:
- Audit and group feedback (A&F) is a method to enhance healthcare professional performance.
- Sessions involve auditing clinical practice against criteria and providing group feedback facilitated by an expert.
- This study investigated the conduct and action planning outcomes of physician group feedback in nursing homes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To understand the process of physician group feedback sessions in nursing homes.
- To evaluate the extent to which these sessions lead to action planning for quality improvement.
Main Methods:
- Fifteen antibiotic Audit and group feedback sessions in a nursing home network were audio-recorded.
- Transcripts were analyzed using the Framework Method for thematic analysis.
- Analysis incorporated the Calgary A&F Framework and Cooke's model of physician behaviors, with added open inductive codes.
Main Results:
- All sessions included elements of the conceptual model and Calgary A&F Framework.
- Group dynamics and facilitator interactions were key to translating feedback into action plans.
- Physician responses to audit data varied; some embraced positive results, while others questioned data accuracy or cited external factors for non-adherence.
- The extent of reflection and action planning differed, with some groups developing immediate plans and others scheduling follow-ups.
Conclusions:
- Facilitators play a vital role in guiding result interpretation, promoting discussion of change, and aiding action plan development.
- The level of participant reflection and subsequent action planning varied significantly across groups.
- Refining group feedback sessions based on these findings can enhance their effectiveness in supporting physician action planning and improving care quality.
Related Concept Videos
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

