Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Heterotopic Auxiliary Rat Liver Transplantation With Flow-regulated Portal Vein Arterialization in Acute Hepatic Failure
Published on: September 13, 2014
Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS®) and continuous renal replacement therapy for the treatment of
Romit Saxena1, Emma C Alexander1,2, Sander Bontemps3
1Paediatric Intensive Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Insights
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and molecular adsorbent recirculatory system (MARS®) showed similar outcomes for children with paediatric acute liver failure (PALF). Further research is needed to determine the optimal extracorporeal therapy for PALF patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine
- Hepatology
- Nephrology
Background:
- Paediatric acute liver failure (PALF) management has improved, reducing the need for liver transplantation.
- Extracorporeal therapies (ECTs) like continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are increasingly used in PALF, but comparisons between different ECTs are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of paediatric patients with PALF treated with either CRRT or MARS®.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted across two European pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).
- Data from 95 PALF patients (23 treated with MARS®, 72 with CRRT) aged 0-18 years were analyzed.
- Baseline characteristics, biochemical parameters, and clinical outcomes including survival with native liver and overall survival were compared between the MARS® and CRRT groups.
Main Results:
- The MARS® group had a lower proportion of patients on inotropes or ventilation and a lower Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 risk score at admission compared to the CRRT group.
- Despite a sicker cohort in the CRRT group, no significant differences were detected in survival with native liver or overall survival between the MARS® and CRRT groups (65.2% for MARS® vs. 68.1% for CRRT).
Conclusions:
- No significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed between PALF patients treated with CRRT or MARS®.
- Further high-quality research is required to establish the role of different extracorporeal therapies in PALF, considering outcomes, feasibility, and cost.
Abstract:
To describe outcomes of a cohort of patients with paediatric acute liver failure (PALF) treated with either one of two extracorporeal therapies (ECT) - continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and molecular adsorbent recirculatory system (MARS®). Retrospective, observational, cohort study at two European paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) - UK (2006-2017, CRRT) and the Netherlands (2003-2017, MARS® and CRRT). Patients were children (0-18 years) admitted to the PICU with PALF who required CRRT or MARS®. Between each group, we compared baseline characteristics, biochemical parameters at 0 and 24 h after commencing MARS®/CRRT, and clinical outcomes. In total, 95 patients (23 MARS®, 72 CRRT) were included. The median age at admission for the whole cohort was 4.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.0-12.1), and 47/95 (49.5%) of patients had an indeterminate aetiology. A lower proportion of patients in the MARS® group were on inotropes or were ventilated at admission, and they had a lower Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 risk % than the CRRT group (14.5% (7.5-22) vs 20.4% (16.8-26.4), p = 0.002). After treatment, there were no significant differences detected between groups in survival with native liver, or overall survival (15/23 (65.2%) for MARS® and 49/72 (68.1%) for CRRT, p = 0.998).
Conclusion:
We did not detect a significant difference in clinical outcomes between PALF patients treated with CRRT or MARS®, despite a relatively sicker cohort in the CRRT group. Further high-quality evidence is necessary regarding the role of extracorporeal therapies in PALF, with consideration of clinical outcomes, feasibility, and cost.
What Is Known:
• Outcomes for children with paediatric acute liver failure (PALF) have improved in recent years secondary to improved supportive care aimed at avoiding liver transplantation. • Extracorporeal therapies, in particular continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), are increasingly applied in the management of these children; however few studies have compared outcomes between different extracorporeal therapies.
What Is New:
• In this retrospective study across two centres, outcomes between patients with PALF treated with CRRT were compared to patients treated with MARS®. • There was no significant difference in key clinical outcomes between groups, including survival with native liver and overall survival.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Oral Drug Delivery Systems: Continuous-Release Systems
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

