Internal jugular vein versus external jugular vein as the insertion site for totally implantable venous access ports

Chen Zhen1, Wei Yandong1, Ye Mao1

  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.

PubMed

Insights

For pediatric venous access ports, external jugular vein cut-down is a safe and effective method. This technique offers advantages over internal jugular vein access, with comparable complication rates.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Vascular Access
  • Oncology Support

Background:

  • Totally venous access ports (TIVAP) are crucial for long-term therapies in children.
  • Various surgical approaches exist for TIVAP implantation, each with potential risks and benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and efficacy of external jugular vein cut-down versus internal jugular vein cut-down for TIVAP implantation in young children.
  • To evaluate complication rates and quality of life associated with each surgical approach.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized study included 107 children requiring TIVAP implantation between January 2018 and January 2022.
  • Patients were randomly assigned to either the external jugular vein cut-down group (EJVCP) or the internal jugular vein cut-down group (IJVCP).

Main Results:

  • Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the EJVCP group (32.5 min) compared to the IJVCP group (63.6 min).
  • The overall incidence of late complications was similar between the EJVCP group (14.5%) and the IJVCP group (13.4%).

Conclusions:

  • External jugular vein access is superficial, easy to learn, and poses minimal physiological importance.
  • External jugular vein cut-down is a safe and effective first-choice method for TIVAP implantation in children, without increasing complications.
Abstract