Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions in Reconstructive Urology
Mark N Alshak1, Johanna Cecelic2, Isabella Florissi1
1The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Introduction:
Artificial intelligence (such as Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer [ChatGPT]) augments patient education on medical topics, including reconstructive surgery. In this study, we assess the information, misinformation, and readability of ChatGPT responses to reconstructive urology questions. We also evaluate prompt engineering to optimize responses.
Methods:
One hundred twenty-five questions were presented to ChatGPT (version 4 omni [ChatGPT-4o], OpenAI) and were divided into 6 domains: stress urinary continence, neurogenic bladder, urethral stricture, ureteral stricture, impotence, and Peyronie disease. Quality of health information was assessed using DISCERN (1 [low] to 5 [high]). Understandability and actionability were assessed using Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P; 0% [low] to 100% [high]). Misinformation was scored from 1 (no misinformation) to 5 (high misinformation). Grade and reading level were calculated using the Flesch-Kincaid scale (5 [easy] to 16 [difficult] and 100-90 [fifth grade level] to 10-0 [professional level], respectively).
Results:
Mean and median DISCERN scores were 3.63 and 5. PEMAT-P understandability was 85.3% but only 37.2% on actionability. There was little misinformation (mean, range: 1.23, 1-4). Responses were at a college graduate reading level. Using prompt engineering in the incontinence domain, scores for DISCERN (3.57-4.75, P = .007), PEMAT-P understandability (89.6% to 96.2%, P < .001), actionability (38.3% to 93.5%, P < .001), and reading level (grade 12.4-5.4, P < .01) all improved significantly while misinformation and word count did not change significantly.
Conclusions:
ChatGPT-4o's responses are of high quality and understandability with little misinformation. Limitations include actionability and advanced reading level. Using prompt engineering, these deficiencies were addressed without increasing misinformation. ChatGPT-4o can help augment reconstructive urology.
More Related Videos
03:51Author Spotlight: Advanced Treatment of Seminal Duct Blockage Employing Endoscopy-Mediated Semen Channel Refluviation
Published on: December 8, 2023
02:21Microscopic Electric Rotary Grinding of Plaques Combined with Graft Repair in the Management of Peyronie's Disease
Published on: March 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System I: Health History
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System II: Inspection and Palpation
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care