Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Suicide-Risk Identification Across Developmental and Behavioral Pediatric Practices: A DBPNet Study
Kate E Wallis1, Sarah N Wozniak-Kelly2, Jaclyn Cacia3
1PolicyLab (KE Wallis, SN Wozniak-Kelly, and KK Wu), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (KE Wallis and J Cacia), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Center for Autism Research (KE Wallis and SN Wozniak-Kelly), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa; Perelman School of Medicine (KE Wallis), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Objective:
To identify variations in practices, facilitators of and barriers to universal suicide screening of children and adolescents with IDDs in pediatric developmental and behavioral health settings.
Methods:
Centers from the Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network (DBPNet) were invited to describe suicide-screening practices in their developmental-behavioral pediatrics, psychology, and/or psychiatry clinics. A representative per site/specialty was asked to complete surveys (summarized with descriptive statistics) and semi-structured interviews (summarized using thematic analysis) to explore sites' current practices, and barriers/facilitators to screening.
Results:
Participants included 34 survey respondents and 21 interviewees. Surveys revealed variation in suicide screening practices across sites; 44.1% of respondents reported that their practice conducts universal screening, but the screening processes varied widely. Interviews identified some facilitators to screening youth with IDD, such as standardizing procedures, training, and having staff available to respond to positive screens. Barriers to universal screening include factors at the patient, family, provider, and system levels. Insufficient mental health care systems, as well as a lack of IDD-specific supports, are significant challenges.
Conclusions:
Despite Joint Commission requirements and specific expertise in behavioral health, sites serving patients with IDD vary widely in how suicide screening is implemented and how positive screens are addressed. Findings offer opportunities to standardize procedures to increase suicide risk identification and response.
More Related Videos
05:52Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
Published on: November 21, 2013
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Borderline Personality Disorder
Genetic and Environmental Contributions
Borderline Personality...