Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bilateral fuchs uveitis syndrome and its association with multiple sclerosis.

International ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Serum Markers of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Status in Keratoconus: Ischemia-Modified Albumin, Malondialdehyde, and Total Thiol Levels.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same author

Effect of peripapillary atrophy on parameters of the optic nerve head, the peripapillary region and the macula in eyes with myopia.

International ophthalmology·2026
Same author

​Altered serum biomarkers of oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Surgical management of medically uncontrolled synechial angle-closure Glaucoma: Lensectomy <i>with or without</i> Goniosynechialysis.

European journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Evolving Minds: Natural Learning vs. Artificial Learning in Ophthalmology Training.

Turkish journal of ophthalmology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2025

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.4K

Using ChatGPT-4 in visual field test assessment.

Gulsah Gumus Akgun1, Cigdem Altan1, Ali Safa Balci1

  • 1Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

Clinical & Experimental Optometry
|February 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary

ChatGPT-4 shows high accuracy in interpreting visual field test names and patterns, but struggles with complex map interpretation and diagnosis. This highlights potential for AI in ophthalmology, with room for improvement in detailed visual field analysis.

Keywords:
Artificial intelligenceChatGPTlarge language modelvisual field test

More Related Videos

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.2K
Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
05:10

Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System

Published on: March 17, 2023

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2025

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.4K
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.2K
Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
05:10

Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System

Published on: March 17, 2023

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Visual field testing is crucial for diagnosing and managing ophthalmic diseases like glaucoma.
  • Integrating advanced AI, such as ChatGPT-4, offers potential to enhance clinical decision-making and accessibility in eye care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy and capability of ChatGPT-4 in interpreting various components of visual field tests.
  • To compare AI interpretation with expert ophthalmologists' assessments.

Main Methods:

  • 30 patient visual field printouts were analyzed by ChatGPT-4.
  • Performance was assessed on identifying test elements (name, pattern, reliability, maps) and diagnostic categorization.
  • Comparison was made against interpretations from two glaucoma consultants.

Main Results:

  • ChatGPT-4 achieved high accuracy for test names (100%), patterns (90%), and reliability indices (93.3%).
  • Interpretation of deviation and greyscale maps yielded lower accuracy (66.7% and 30%, respectively).
  • Accurate 'normal' classification or diagnosis suggestion was achieved in only 33.3% of cases.

Conclusions:

  • Large language models like ChatGPT-4 demonstrate significant potential in analyzing visual field tests, particularly numerical data.
  • Current limitations exist in interpreting complex visual field maps and providing accurate diagnostic suggestions.
  • Further development is needed for AI to fully support clinical interpretation of visual field defects.