Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

08:55
Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
Published on: February 8, 2018
9.1K
Mechanisms of Proactive Adaptation in a Rewarded Response Inhibition Task: Executive, Motor, or Attentional Effects?
Garance M Meyer1,2,3,4,5,6, Maëlle Riou7,8,9,10, Philippe Boulinguez7,8,9,10
1Université de Lyon, 69622, Lyon, France. gmeyer3@bwh.harvard.edu.
Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
|February 12, 2025
Summary
Reward motivation influences inhibitory control, but not through proactive control as hypothesized. Instead, attention and motor activations adapt to reward contexts, impacting performance in Go/NoGo tasks.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psychophysiology
Background:
- Reward motivation significantly impacts inhibitory control performance.
- The precise neurocognitive mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear.
- Proactive inhibitory control is hypothesized to mediate speed-accuracy trade-offs in response to varying incentives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether proactive inhibitory control modulates speed-accuracy trade-offs under different reward motivational contexts.
- To examine the neurophysiological underpinnings of reward modulation on inhibitory control using electroencephalography (EEG).
Main Methods:
- A preregistered study involving 30 healthy participants performing a modified Go/NoGo task.
- Manipulation of motivational context using varying monetary rewards for Go vs. NoGo successes.
- High-density EEG recording and source-space analyses to track brain oscillatory activity.
Main Results:
- Participants adjusted behavior according to motivational context, but not via proactive inhibitory control modulation.
- No evidence supported the hypothesis that proactive inhibitory control mediates reward-based speed-accuracy trade-offs.
- Unplanned analyses indicated faster reaction times linked to heightened attention for high-reward stimuli and increased errors associated with motor activation for Go stimuli.
Conclusions:
- The study failed to find support for proactive inhibitory control as the mechanism for reward modulation in inhibitory control.
- Findings suggest alternative mechanisms, including top-down attention and motor activation, are involved in reward-based performance adjustments.
- Results underscore the complexity of reward's influence on inhibitory control and impulsivity, necessitating nuanced investigation into contributing factors.

