Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

A Doxorubicin-induced Cardiomyopathy Model in Adult Zebrafish
Published on: June 7, 2018
Distinct Impact of Doxorubicin on Skeletal Muscle and Fat Metabolism in Mice: Without Dexrazoxane Effect
Birgit Van Asbroeck1,2, Dustin N Krüger2, Siel Van den Bogaert2
1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy, Research Group MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract:
The chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin (DOX) leads to the loss of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue mass, contributing to cancer cachexia. Experimental research on the molecular mechanisms of long-term DOX treatment is modest, and its effect on both skeletal muscle and adipose tissue has not been studied in an integrative manner. Dexrazoxane (DEXRA) is used to prevent DOX-induced cancer-therapy-related cardiovascular dysfunction (CTRCD), but its impact on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue remains elusive. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term effects of DOX on adipose tissue and skeletal muscle metabolism, and evaluate whether DEXRA can mitigate these effects. To this end, 10-week-old male C57BL6/J mice (n = 32) were divided into four groups: (1) DOX, (2) DOX-DEXRA combined, (3) DEXRA and (4) control. DOX (4 mg/kg weekly) and DEXRA (40 mg/kg weekly) were administered intraperitoneally over 6 weeks. Indirect calorimetry was used to assess metabolic parameters, followed by a molecular analysis and histological evaluation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. DOX treatment led to significant white adipose tissue (WAT) loss (74%) and moderate skeletal muscle loss (Gastrocnemius (GAS): 10%), along with decreased basal activity (53%) and energy expenditure (27%). A trend toward a reduced type IIa fiber cross-sectional area and a fast-to-slow fiber type switch in the Soleus muscle was observed. The WAT of DOX-treated mice displayed reduced Pparg (p < 0.0001), Cd36 (p < 0.0001) and Glut4 (p < 0.05) mRNA expression-markers of fat and glucose metabolism-compared to controls. In contrast, the GAS of DOX-treated mice showed increased Cd36 (p < 0.05) and Glut4 (p < 0.01), together with elevated Pdk4 (p < 0.001) mRNA expression-suggesting reduced carbohydrate oxidation-compared to controls. Additionally, DOX increased Murf1 (p < 0.05) and Atrogin1 (p < 0.05) mRNA expression-markers of protein degradation-compared to controls. In both the WAT and GAS of DOX-treated mice, Ppard mRNA expression remained unchanged. Overall, DEXRA failed to prevent these DOX-induced changes. Collectively, our results suggest that DOX induced varying degrees of wasting in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, driven by distinct mechanisms. While DEXRA protected against DOX-induced CTRCD, it did not counteract its adverse effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue.

