Comparison of Neural Network Structures for Identifying Shockable Rhythm During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Background/Objectives: Minimizing interruptions in chest compressions is very important when resuscitating patients with cardiac arrest. Recently, research has analyzed electrocardiograms (ECGs) during chest compressions using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). This study aimed to compare the accuracy of deeper neural networks and more advanced structures. Methods: ECGs with chest compression artifacts were obtained from patients who visited the emergency department of Korea University Ansan Hospital from September 2019 to February 2024. We compared the accuracy of a deeper CNN, long short-term memory (LSTM), and a CNN with an attention mechanism and residual block against a reference model. The input of the model was 5 s ECG segments with compression artifacts, and the output was the probability that the ECG with the artifacts was a shockable rhythm. Results: A total of 1889 ECGs with compression artifacts from 172 patients were included in this study. There were 969 ECGs annotated as shockable and 920 as non-shockable. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the reference model was 0.8672. The AUROCs of the deeper CNN for five and seven layers were 0.7374 and 0.6950, respectively. The AUROCs of LSTM and bidirectional LSTM were 0.7719 and 0.8287, respectively. The AUROC of the CNN with the attention mechanism and residual block was 0.7759. Conclusions: CNNs with deeper layers or those incorporating attention mechanisms, residual blocks, and LSTM architectures did not exhibit better accuracy. To improve the model accuracy, a larger dataset or advanced augmentation techniques may be required, rather than complicating the structure of the model.