Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Flow Cytometry01:23

Flow Cytometry

12.2K
The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...
12.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Study of inborn errors of immunity associated lymphoid proliferations identifies association of presence of somatic variations with large cell morphology, copy number alterations in TNFAIP3 and heterozygous variants in EMSY.

Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology·2026
Same author

DinoFlow: Self-supervised pretraining in flow cytometry enables accurate detection of common hematopathological disorders.

Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry·2026
Same author

27-color flow cytometry for measurable residual disease detection in B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia.

Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry·2026
Same author

Evaluation of the Ultima Genomics UG 100 sequencer for low-cost, high-sensitivity metagenomic pathogen detection from cerebrospinal fluid.

Microbiology spectrum·2026
Same author

Embracing Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Support Tool for Clinical Decision-Making.

Clinical chemistry·2025
Same author

Acute Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage With RUNX1 Mutations Show Similar Prognosis Compared to Acute Myeloid Leukemia With RUNX1 Mutations: A Study From the Bone Marrow Pathology Group.

American journal of hematology·2025
Same journal

RETRACTED: Sabir et al. DNA Based and Stimuli-Responsive Smart Nanocarrier for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer: Applications and Challenges. <i>Cancers</i> 2021, <i>13</i>, 3396.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Adeluola et al. Chemoprevention of 4-NQO-Induced Oral Cancer by the Combination of Resveratrol and EGCG: In Vivo, In Silico and In Vitro Studies. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 1098.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Peñalver et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma-Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO) 2026. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 395.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Accorsi Buttini et al. Development of a Simplified Geriatric Score-4 (SGS-4) to Predict Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged over 50. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 3278.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Age-Stratified Long-Term Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Stage IV Melanoma and NSCLC in The Netherlands: A Population-Based Study.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Targeting Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Tumor Microenvironment, and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Cancers·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2025

Quality-Controlled Sputum Analysis by Flow Cytometry
07:22

Quality-Controlled Sputum Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Published on: August 9, 2021

5.0K

Machine Learning Methods in Clinical Flow Cytometry.

Nicholas C Spies1,2, Alexandra Rangel2, Paul English2

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

Cancers
|February 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning (ML) enhances flow cytometry analysis by moving beyond manual gating to computational methods. This approach improves the identification of cell populations and disease states in complex datasets.

Keywords:
acute leukemiaclinical flow cytometrymachine learningoperational efficiency

More Related Videos

Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
09:01

Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up

Published on: March 26, 2018

13.9K
Discrimination of Seven Immune Cell Subsets by Two-fluorochrome Flow Cytometry
10:58

Discrimination of Seven Immune Cell Subsets by Two-fluorochrome Flow Cytometry

Published on: March 5, 2019

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2025

Quality-Controlled Sputum Analysis by Flow Cytometry
07:22

Quality-Controlled Sputum Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Published on: August 9, 2021

5.0K
Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
09:01

Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up

Published on: March 26, 2018

13.9K
Discrimination of Seven Immune Cell Subsets by Two-fluorochrome Flow Cytometry
10:58

Discrimination of Seven Immune Cell Subsets by Two-fluorochrome Flow Cytometry

Published on: March 5, 2019

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Immunology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Traditional manual gating in flow cytometry struggles with complex, high-volume data.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers advanced computational approaches for more effective data analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of ML integration in flow cytometry.
  • To detail the shift from manual to computational analysis and highlight data quality importance.
  • To discuss various ML techniques and their application in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of supervised learning (e.g., logistic regression, SVMs, neural networks) for classification.
  • Discussion of unsupervised learning (e.g., k-means, FlowSOM, UMAP, t-SNE) for novel population discovery.
  • Review of semi-supervised and weakly supervised methods for improved performance with partial data.

Main Results:

  • ML techniques offer superior analysis of complex flow cytometry data compared to manual methods.
  • Supervised methods aid in disease state classification, while unsupervised methods reveal new cell populations.
  • Practical implementation requires attention to data quality, preprocessing, validation, and generalizability.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning holds transformative potential for uncovering biological insights in flow cytometry.
  • Successful ML deployment necessitates collaboration between domain experts and data scientists.
  • The integration of ML is crucial for advancing flow cytometry applications in research and clinical practice.