Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The median lethal dose and its estimation.

D J Finney

    Archives of Toxicology
    |February 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Estimating the median lethal dose (LD50) requires careful statistical consideration. Maximum likelihood estimation is recommended for accurate LD50 calculations, offering superior precision and reduced bias compared to older methods.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The estimation of the frequency of recombinations; matings of known phase.

    Journal of genetics·2014
    Same author

    The analysis of a factorial series of insecticide tests.

    The Annals of applied biology·2010
    Same author

    The design and statistical analysis of microbiological assays.

    Quarterly journal of pharmacy and pharmacology·2010
    Same author

    Field sampling for the estimation of wireworm populations.

    Biometrics·2010
    Same author

    The estimation of bacterial densities from dilution series.

    The Journal of hygiene·2010
    Same author

    Errors of estimation in inverse sampling.

    Nature·2010

    Area of Science:

    • Toxicology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Regulatory systems often rely on median lethal dose (LD50) estimates from animal studies for human toxicity assessment.
    • Previous work highlights significant weaknesses in using LD50 as a sole indicator of human toxicity.
    • This paper focuses on the statistical challenges in LD50 estimation, not the ethical debate surrounding its use.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address statistical aspects of LD50 estimation often overlooked or misunderstood.
    • To differentiate between the true dose-mortality relationship and its experimental estimation.
    • To evaluate various statistical methods for LD50 determination.

    Main Methods:

    • Critique of graphical and semi-graphical methods, deeming them suitable only for preliminary indications with inadequate data.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of simple arithmetical methods, identifying their potential for imprecision and bias.
  • Evaluation of the Spearman-Kärber method, noting its utility but also its reliance on unverifiable assumptions.
  • Advocacy for maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) using parametric response curves as the optimal approach.

    • Main Results:

    • Graphical and simple arithmetic methods are generally suboptimal for LD50 estimation.
    • The Spearman-Kärber method is a viable option but has limitations.
    • Maximum likelihood estimation provides a theoretically sound and practically efficient method for LD50 determination.
    • Modern computational power makes MLE feasible for routine use.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate LD50 estimation necessitates a clear understanding of statistical principles.
    • Maximum likelihood estimation of parametric dose-response curves is the preferred method for LD50 calculation.
    • This approach offers superior accuracy and efficiency, especially with the availability of microcomputers.