Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

Utilizing Soil Density Fractionation to Separate Distinct Soil Carbon Pools
Published on: December 16, 2022
Artificial destratification options for reservoir management
Fred Chaaya1, Brett Miller1, Matthew Gordos2
1Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Manly Vale 2093, NSW, Australia.
Abstract:
Reservoir stratification impacts reservoir and downstream water quality, creating complex management challenges driven by interactions between hydrodynamics, weather patterns, and nutrient dynamics. Artificial destratification is one technique used to ameliorate the impacts of stratified reservoirs, with bubble plumes or mechanical mixers being the primary methods employed. This global review assessed 138 bubble plume and mechanical mixer artificial destratification systems installed in 114 reservoirs to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of each method. Destratification systems were assessed in terms of their effectiveness in breaking thermal stratification and consequently mitigating cold water pollution, increasing dissolved oxygen concentrations throughout the water column, reducing the concentration of soluble metals, and reducing (potentially toxic) cyanobacteria populations. Bubble plume destratification was found to be more effective than mechanical mixing at mitigating the impacts of thermal stratification. Successful thermal destratification was closely linked to subsequent increases in dissolved oxygen concentrations and decreases in manganese and iron concentrations. Mixed results were observed for the reduction of cyanobacteria populations from artificial destratification; however, a correlation was observed between cyanobacteria control and successful thermal destratification in deeper reservoirs. Achieving thermal destratification was closely linked to the ratio of the reservoir capacity to the air flowrate used for destratification (the "volumetric destratification coefficient"). Failed thermal destratification was observed in reservoirs where the volumetric destratification coefficient was less than approximately 0.005 L/s/ML. This review identified the potential for scalability of bubble plume destratification across different reservoirs, but future research needs to provide more quantitative data that can be used to develop holistic design guidelines for bubble plume destratification systems for a wide range of reservoirs and operational conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation
Centrifugation
Underflow Gates

