Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Use of a Central Venous Line for Fluids, Drugs and Nutrient Administration in a Mouse Model of Critical Illness
Published on: May 2, 2017
On how to feed critically ill children in intensive care: A slowly shifting paradigm
Jan Gunst1, Ilse Vanhorebeek1, Sascha Cat Verbruggen2
1Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.
Insights
Early enhanced nutrition in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) did not improve outcomes and increased infections. Restrictive feeding strategies may be beneficial, activating fasting responses while preventing deficiencies.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Clinical nutrition
- Metabolic research
Background:
- Critically ill children in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) often experience anorexia and feeding intolerance, leading to macronutrient deficits.
- Historically, early enteral or parenteral nutrition was initiated to improve outcomes in these patients.
- The causal link between macronutrient deficits and outcomes was questioned.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether early parenteral nutrition supplementation in pediatric intensive care patients, when enteral nutrition is insufficient or contraindicated, improves outcomes.
- To determine the causal relationship between early enhanced nutrition and patient outcomes in the PICU setting.
Main Methods:
- Conducted the multicenter 'Early-versus-Late-Parenteral-Nutrition-in-the-Pediatric-Intensive-Care-Unit' randomized controlled trial (PEPaNIC-RCT).
- Compared early parenteral nutrition supplementation versus accepting a macronutrient deficit during the first week in the PICU.
Main Results:
- Early parenteral nutrition supplementation did not improve outcomes compared to accepting a deficit.
- Early enhanced nutrition led to increased infections, prolonged organ support, longer PICU stays, and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- Harm was observed across subgroups and linked to macronutrient dose, particularly amino acids.
Conclusions:
- Early enhanced nutrition in critically ill children does not improve outcomes and can cause harm.
- Findings suggest a shift towards more restrictive macronutrient administration in the acute phase of critical illness.
- Activating fasting-induced cellular repair with adequate micronutrient support may be a beneficial strategy.
Abstract:
Critically ill children requiring treatment in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) suffer from anorexia and/or feeding intolerance. The resulting macronutrient deficit associates with poor outcome. Until recently, this association formed the basis for initiating enteral or parenteral feeding early to improve outcome. The multicenter "Early-versus-Late-Parenteral-Nutrition-in-the-Pediatric-Intensive-Care-Unit" randomized controlled trial (PEPaNIC-RCT) addressed whether this association is causal. It showed that early supplementation of insufficient/contraindicated enteral nutrition with parenteral nutrition, as compared with accepting a macronutrient deficit throughout the first week in the PICU, did not improve outcome. On the contrary, it caused more infections and prolonged organ support and PICU stay, and adversely affected neurodevelopmental outcomes 2 and 4 years later. Harm was present in all subgroups and appeared explained by the macronutrient dose, more specifically the amino-acid dose, not lipid or glucose doses. These findings corroborated results from large-scale adult RCTs. Mechanisms of harm from early enhanced nutrition comprised suppressed cellular repair pathways like autophagy and ketogenesis, suppressed illness-induced alterations in thyroid hormone metabolism, more iatrogenic hyperglycemia, increased urea cycle activity through anabolic resistance, and induction of epigenetic modifications that mediate longer-term developmental impairments. These results came unexpected to many pediatric intensivists. Hence, the paradigm has only slowly begun to shift toward more restrictive macronutrient administration in the acute phase of critical illness. Benefits of early fasting responses have become clear, provided micronutrients are given to prevent deficiencies and refeeding syndrome. These insights open perspectives for studies investigating novel nutritional strategies to activate fasting-induced cellular repair while avoiding prolonged starvation.
Related Concept Videos
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...

