Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Development, Content Validity, and Test-Retest Reliability of a Childhood Hydrocephalus Severity Scale
Olufemi Emmanuel Idowu1,2, Jeuel Ogooluwa Idowu2
1Department of Surgery, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Introduction:
This study aimed to develop and validate a reliable, multidomain scale for assessing childhood hydrocephalus severity and to enhance communication, guide treatment decisions, and improve patient care.
Methods:
A stepwise consensus approach informed by a modified Delphi technique was employed. Healthcare professionals participated in anonymous surveys and face-to-face meetings to define the core domains of the scale. Content validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability were assessed.
Results:
The Delphi process yielded a refined 7-item, 10-point Childhood Hydrocephalus Severity Scale (CHS) focusing on age, Evans index, associated malformations, neurological deficit, intraventricular hemorrhage, and mid-arm circumference. Content validity analysis using the Content Validity Index (CVI) demonstrated strong agreement (mean I-CVI = 0.91) among experts regarding the relevance of CHS items. All individual item CVI scores exceeded 0.8, supporting the inclusion of each factor. The CHS exhibited excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.988). High intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were observed for both single measures (ICC = 0.902, 95% CI: 0.862-0.931) and average measures (ICC = 0.985, 95% CI: 0.978-0.990), indicating near-perfect agreement between raters. Both ICC values were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The CHS demonstrates promising potential as a reliable and valid tool for childhood hydrocephalus severity assessment. This scale has the potential to enhance communication, guide treatment decisions, and improve patient care in childhood hydrocephalus.
