Impact of the leadership styles of school principals on bullying victimization and perpetration among youth

  • 0Institute of Public Affairs, Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland. jakub.kolodziejczyk@uj.edu.pl.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

School principal leadership styles impact student bullying. Charismatic leadership correlates with more bullying, while team-oriented and humane-oriented styles offer protection against victimization and perpetration.

Area Of Science

  • Educational Psychology
  • Public Health
  • Organizational Behavior

Background

  • School bullying is a pervasive issue impacting student development and public health.
  • Socioecological models highlight individual and contextual factors in bullying.
  • Emerging research suggests school principal leadership influences bullying dynamics.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To investigate the relationship between principal leadership styles and student-reported bullying.
  • To determine if specific leadership approaches mitigate or exacerbate bullying.

Main Methods

  • Survey data from 3,863 students (grades 7-9) across 22 schools.
  • Collected data on student bullying (victimization/perpetration), school climate, and principal leadership styles.
  • Utilized logistic regression for data analysis.

Main Results

  • Charismatic leadership associated with increased student bullying (victimization and perpetration).
  • Team-oriented leadership linked to decreased student victimization.
  • Humane-oriented leadership associated with reduced student bullying perpetration.

Conclusions

  • Principal leadership styles can function as either risk or protective factors in peer bullying.
  • Findings add complexity to understanding leadership's role in school safety.
  • Highlights the importance of specific leadership approaches in preventing bullying.

Related Concept Videos

Bullying 02:04

8.3K

A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is...

Parenting Styles 01:27

54

Diana Baumrind's four parenting styles — authoritarian, authoritative, neglectful, and permissive — each influence children's socio-emotional development differently.
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...

Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity 01:23

41

Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....

Conduct Disorder 01:28

25

Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...

The Stanford Prison Experiment 03:20

22.9K

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.

Social Roles

One major social determinant of human behavior is our social role—a pattern of behavior that is expected of a person in a given setting or group (Hare, 2003). Each one of us has several social roles. You may be, at the same time, a student, a parent, an aspiring...

Fundamental Attribution Error 01:14

12.8K

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...