Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Informing Management of Patients Developing Cardiogenic Shock at a Spoke and Being Transferred to a Hub
Christos P Kyriakopoulos1,2, Iosif Taleb1,2, Konstantinos Sideris1
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Health and School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.
Background:
Multidisciplinary teams and regionalized care systems have been suggested to improve cardiogenic shock (CS) outcomes. We sought to identify clinical factors associated with successful outcomes for patients developing CS at an outside healthcare facility (spoke) and being transferred to a quaternary medical center (hub).
Methods And Results:
Consecutive patients with CS were evaluated (N=1162). Our study cohort comprised 412 patients developing CS at a spoke. Our primary end point was native heart survival (NHS) defined as survival to discharge without receiving advanced heart failure therapies. Secondary end points were survival to discharge, 30-day and 1-year survival after discharge, and adverse events. Association of clinical data with NHS was analyzed using logistic regression. Overall, 246 (59.7%) patients achieved NHS, 125 (30.3%) died, and 41 (10.0%) were discharged after advanced heart failure therapies. Of the 287 patients who were discharged (69.7%), 276 (67.0%) were alive at 30 days, and 250 (60.7%) at 1 year. Patients with NHS less commonly had bleeding or vascular complications or acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy compared with patients who died or received advanced heart failure therapies. Significant multivariable factors associated with NHS likelihood included younger age; shorter length of stay and transfer from a secondary compared with a tertiary/quaternary level of care spoke; absence of cardiac arrest, intubation, or type 3 bleeding; lower vasoactive-inotropic score; higher left ventricular ejection fraction at admission to the hub; and shorter CS onset-to-temporary mechanical circulatory support deployment time.
Conclusions:
We identified clinical factors reflecting disease severity and management practices including length of stay and spoke level of care, inotrope/vasopressor utilization, and CS onset-to-temporary mechanical circulatory support deployment time, that might inform the management of patients developing CS at a spoke.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...

