Pharmacovigilance for Vaccines Used in Pregnancy: A Gap Analysis From Uganda

Despite the effectiveness of maternal vaccines, low- and middle-income countries grapple with inadequate safety monitoring systems. Robust safety surveillance is crucial to increasing vaccine confidence and timely identifying any potential safety signal that could put pregnant women and children at risk following vaccination. This study assessed the pharmacovigilance (PV) systems for vaccines used in pregnancy in Uganda.

A qualitative study involves 13 key informant interviews and 8 focus group discussions among key stakeholders. Purposive sampling was used to select study participants. Data analysis was done using Miles and Huberman's matrices approach and conducted in Atlas.ti software.

A passive system involving multistakeholders at various levels of the healthcare structure existed but was inadequate for monitoring adverse events following maternal immunization. The existence of parallel reporting systems for vaccines was noted. Heavy workload, lack of feedback, inadequate knowledge to recognize and report adverse events following maternal immunizations and logistical challenges impeding reporting and follow-up were among the barriers to reporting. Electronic medical records, though underutilized for safety surveillance, offer promising potential.

To address the specific needs of maternal vaccination, the PV system in Uganda needs improvement. A multipronged approach, including policy coherence, embracing active surveillance and leveraging existing birth outcome surveillance and electronic medical records, is essential. Harnessing healthcare provider knowledge and advisory committee capacity in causality assessment is also necessary. The study findings can inform priority interventions to enhance PV for existing and new maternal vaccines.